Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
Careful Shot vs Twin Strike....No Contest (4e spoilers)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Stalker0" data-source="post: 4267674" data-attributes="member: 5889"><p>Okay, this thread has gotten WAY off topic.</p><p></p><p>Guys, we are comparing careful shot and twin strike in this thread. We are not going through every fighter power in the game. Do that in another thread.</p><p></p><p>Back to the topic on hand. People are asking a logical question, is it that careful shot is too weak, or is twin shot too good? For that answer, let's turn to other classes and see what they have.</p><p></p><p>The rogue is the most comparable, both are strikers that use weapons. The rogue's piercing shot is a weapon attack vs reflex. The difference between Reflex and AC varies widely among the monsters. Some have as high as a +6 or so difference. But I think the vast majority have at least a +2 difference. And the rogue gets to keep his dex bonus to damage.</p><p></p><p>Then there's the paladin's valiant strike, which is another "sure hitting" ability. The paladin gets at least a +1 to attack, and will often have a +2. Further, he could have as high as +6 or even +8. And once again the paladin gets to keep his str bonus to damage.</p><p></p><p>Comparing those models, changing the ranger's careful shot to +2 to attack, regular damage seems completely reasonable. And it also makes sense from a flavor perspective. The ranger gets to add his dex bonus with a ranged weapon because of his accuracy. A "careful" shot should be highly accurate (ie dex is added to damage). While a twin shot, where you are literally firing two arrows as fast as you can, would not have that accuracy and so no dex mod.</p><p></p><p></p><p>I ran the numbers with this assumption in mind, and its almost there. If we assume a +4 dex and no hunter's quarry, careful shot is always averaging more damage than twin strike, but only about .3 more. However, twin strike's accuracy is higher. You are more consistently hitting with twin strike, and you have the option is hitting two targets, making it a much better mook killer. However, when you add in hunter's quarry, twin strike takes over again.</p><p></p><p>So one more tweak to careful shot. We now add +3 to the attack roll. With that in mind, careful shot takes back the damage crown, average about .5 damage more than twin shot. Twin shot still carries the advantages of higher accuracy and mook killing, and I think both are now fairly competitive with each other.</p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong>With that in mind, I think changing careful shot to attack +3, damage 1[w] + dex should solve the problem.</strong></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Stalker0, post: 4267674, member: 5889"] Okay, this thread has gotten WAY off topic. Guys, we are comparing careful shot and twin strike in this thread. We are not going through every fighter power in the game. Do that in another thread. Back to the topic on hand. People are asking a logical question, is it that careful shot is too weak, or is twin shot too good? For that answer, let's turn to other classes and see what they have. The rogue is the most comparable, both are strikers that use weapons. The rogue's piercing shot is a weapon attack vs reflex. The difference between Reflex and AC varies widely among the monsters. Some have as high as a +6 or so difference. But I think the vast majority have at least a +2 difference. And the rogue gets to keep his dex bonus to damage. Then there's the paladin's valiant strike, which is another "sure hitting" ability. The paladin gets at least a +1 to attack, and will often have a +2. Further, he could have as high as +6 or even +8. And once again the paladin gets to keep his str bonus to damage. Comparing those models, changing the ranger's careful shot to +2 to attack, regular damage seems completely reasonable. And it also makes sense from a flavor perspective. The ranger gets to add his dex bonus with a ranged weapon because of his accuracy. A "careful" shot should be highly accurate (ie dex is added to damage). While a twin shot, where you are literally firing two arrows as fast as you can, would not have that accuracy and so no dex mod. I ran the numbers with this assumption in mind, and its almost there. If we assume a +4 dex and no hunter's quarry, careful shot is always averaging more damage than twin strike, but only about .3 more. However, twin strike's accuracy is higher. You are more consistently hitting with twin strike, and you have the option is hitting two targets, making it a much better mook killer. However, when you add in hunter's quarry, twin strike takes over again. So one more tweak to careful shot. We now add +3 to the attack roll. With that in mind, careful shot takes back the damage crown, average about .5 damage more than twin shot. Twin shot still carries the advantages of higher accuracy and mook killing, and I think both are now fairly competitive with each other. [B] With that in mind, I think changing careful shot to attack +3, damage 1[w] + dex should solve the problem.[/B] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
Careful Shot vs Twin Strike....No Contest (4e spoilers)
Top