Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Carrying capacity: The ruling currency?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Frostmarrow" data-source="post: 6075806" data-attributes="member: 1122"><p>I was thinking that maybe carrying capacity is, or should be, the most important currency in the game. Problem is, historically, carrying capacity has been too granular and fiddly and thus too often neglected, so that it has lost its value.</p><p></p><p>The main problem has been carrying capacity being derived from strength. A low strength wizard, according to the rules has barely been able to drag his walking stick behind him. Also, the ridiculous amounts of treasure, "a small moon of gold", found during standard quests has made certain that carrying capacity has been hand-waved.</p><p></p><p>In the old days of computer games, and maybe even today, carrying capacity has been symbolized by item slots. Why has this not been ported to D&D, I ask? Why bother with longsword weighing 15 whatevers and not simply have it occupy one slot?</p><p></p><p>I suggest all characters, humanoids, having a carrying capacity of 12 (slots). Then, in order to make it worthwhile to be strong, some items, still plugging up one slot, also requires a certain power of strength to carry effectively. This means a dagger and a bastard sword both occupy one slot but the bastard sword also requires Str13+ to carry (or it will occupy two slots). Great swords might call for two slots and Str15. Such a system, if balanced properly could not only speed up play but also account for wizards not carrying heavy steel shields (making weapon proficiency rules redundant.)</p><p></p><p>A system like this could fill a lot of use in the game. For instance, goods could be a lot more readily available and it could be a lot easier to manufacture great things because balancewise characters are still limited by what they are currently carrying. The bones of a troll could be ground down and packed into handgrenades (since if you do so, something else must be left behind).</p><p></p><p>Naturally Bags of Holding must be nerfed in some way. Perhaps they can only contain gold or maybe only one item per turn can be produced from them.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Frostmarrow, post: 6075806, member: 1122"] I was thinking that maybe carrying capacity is, or should be, the most important currency in the game. Problem is, historically, carrying capacity has been too granular and fiddly and thus too often neglected, so that it has lost its value. The main problem has been carrying capacity being derived from strength. A low strength wizard, according to the rules has barely been able to drag his walking stick behind him. Also, the ridiculous amounts of treasure, "a small moon of gold", found during standard quests has made certain that carrying capacity has been hand-waved. In the old days of computer games, and maybe even today, carrying capacity has been symbolized by item slots. Why has this not been ported to D&D, I ask? Why bother with longsword weighing 15 whatevers and not simply have it occupy one slot? I suggest all characters, humanoids, having a carrying capacity of 12 (slots). Then, in order to make it worthwhile to be strong, some items, still plugging up one slot, also requires a certain power of strength to carry effectively. This means a dagger and a bastard sword both occupy one slot but the bastard sword also requires Str13+ to carry (or it will occupy two slots). Great swords might call for two slots and Str15. Such a system, if balanced properly could not only speed up play but also account for wizards not carrying heavy steel shields (making weapon proficiency rules redundant.) A system like this could fill a lot of use in the game. For instance, goods could be a lot more readily available and it could be a lot easier to manufacture great things because balancewise characters are still limited by what they are currently carrying. The bones of a troll could be ground down and packed into handgrenades (since if you do so, something else must be left behind). Naturally Bags of Holding must be nerfed in some way. Perhaps they can only contain gold or maybe only one item per turn can be produced from them. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Carrying capacity: The ruling currency?
Top