Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Carrying Capacity vs. Shenanigans
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Celebrim" data-source="post: 7230587" data-attributes="member: 4937"><p>If you don't enforce it a little, you get that sort of thing. </p><p></p><p>It's far worse than you think. Your gnome is a small sized creature, so your MAX LOAD is 52 lbs. But as a practical matter anything over about one half of your max load as a routine load is probably absurd. You certainly should be aware if you have anything but a light load.</p><p></p><p>If I found out a strength 7 gnome was carrying 200lbs of stuff around in my game, I'd have a fit. To me, this would be equivalent to a player failing to record damage on his character sheet when he was attacked, or arbitrarily doubling his hit points. Your gnome should be dead, and you have no real excuse because you ought to have known when you created the character that by having strength as a dump stat that you needed to pay special attention to how much you were carrying and consciously stayed aware of your weakness and inability to manage loads. If this was a strength 16 character and he discovered he'd hit 200lb of gear, I'd be like, "That was silly. Next time, pay some attention to your gear."</p><p></p><p>In the case of a strength 7 gnome with 200lb of gear, it would be beyond "silly" or "ridiculous" or we have a chuckle about how players always forget encumbrance, I'd be like, "Your character has had a heart attack from over exertion and is now dead and cannot be resurrected."</p><p></p><p>Whatever the litmus test is, you are so far beyond it that it's hardly reasonable to have this as a starting point regarding a good litmus test.</p><p></p><p>For me, it would be that you examine your gear regularly enough that you do not hit a heavy load very often and when you do, you try to do something about it when you do notice, and you at least pay some attention to the fact you are adding a heavy item to your inventory. </p><p></p><p>As with the comic you link to, I'm a little more forgiving with "The NPC is carrying the gear." because typically their ability to contribute to combat is already limited, but I would find it silly if the NPC had gone beyond max load.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Celebrim, post: 7230587, member: 4937"] If you don't enforce it a little, you get that sort of thing. It's far worse than you think. Your gnome is a small sized creature, so your MAX LOAD is 52 lbs. But as a practical matter anything over about one half of your max load as a routine load is probably absurd. You certainly should be aware if you have anything but a light load. If I found out a strength 7 gnome was carrying 200lbs of stuff around in my game, I'd have a fit. To me, this would be equivalent to a player failing to record damage on his character sheet when he was attacked, or arbitrarily doubling his hit points. Your gnome should be dead, and you have no real excuse because you ought to have known when you created the character that by having strength as a dump stat that you needed to pay special attention to how much you were carrying and consciously stayed aware of your weakness and inability to manage loads. If this was a strength 16 character and he discovered he'd hit 200lb of gear, I'd be like, "That was silly. Next time, pay some attention to your gear." In the case of a strength 7 gnome with 200lb of gear, it would be beyond "silly" or "ridiculous" or we have a chuckle about how players always forget encumbrance, I'd be like, "Your character has had a heart attack from over exertion and is now dead and cannot be resurrected." Whatever the litmus test is, you are so far beyond it that it's hardly reasonable to have this as a starting point regarding a good litmus test. For me, it would be that you examine your gear regularly enough that you do not hit a heavy load very often and when you do, you try to do something about it when you do notice, and you at least pay some attention to the fact you are adding a heavy item to your inventory. As with the comic you link to, I'm a little more forgiving with "The NPC is carrying the gear." because typically their ability to contribute to combat is already limited, but I would find it silly if the NPC had gone beyond max load. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Carrying Capacity vs. Shenanigans
Top