Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
[cartography] Is this vessel seaworthy?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ziggy" data-source="post: 509717" data-attributes="member: 148"><p>I'm no expert either, but I've been in a few in my life, including some replicas (viking ship and "knarr")</p><p></p><p>The first impression is that it's very wide. While this makes it stable and able to carry lots of cargo, it'll make it sail like a dog. Definitely a boat only for inshore sailing and short voyages. Slimming it down one square would make it more seaworthy, at the expense of cargo capacity (see also rowing later)</p><p></p><p>The mast is a bit too far in front, the best placement (with a single mast) is just a little bit in front of the centre. Move it back at least one (possibly two) squares. </p><p></p><p>Most of the wind pressure will be from the back, you need far stronger support ropes from the main mast fastened in the main body of the boat. You also need a smaller angle on these ropes, thus they need to be fastened further back on the boat. Finally, with a square sail (the "worst"/least advanced type of sail) you must be able to adjust the angle of attack for the sail, thus a separate rope and pulley (sp?) system for the sail is necessary.</p><p></p><p>With a square sail you need oars, as these boats are almost impossible to sail upwind. However the ship is a bit big (and wide) for rowing, especially with only 6 oars (I assume 2 persons per oar). In addition the cabin hinders communication between the rowers on each side, making it very hard to coordinate. And you need something stable to sit on when rowing, which seems hard to do with your design. I would either have removed the oars completely (but then you need a different type of sail), put the oars below deck, or gone for a slimmer design without the cabin between the rowers.</p><p></p><p>The cabin is a bit big for a ship this size, and with the mast in the middle you probably need to slim it a bit down and put it further back. I would also have put the entrance door on the short end, that seem to be the common arrangement on all boats I've been on (probably because it's easier to get a good layout of the cabin). </p><p></p><p>All in all its not bad, it'll probably sail but not very well. The biggest goof is the mast (placement and support ropes), you need to fix that. Apart from that it depends on what you are aiming to use it for. It'll do for inshore trading, but if you want to go outshore (and longer voyages) you need either a slimmer boat with a better oar system, or a proper ship (i.e. larger). </p><p></p><p>.Ziggy</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ziggy, post: 509717, member: 148"] I'm no expert either, but I've been in a few in my life, including some replicas (viking ship and "knarr") The first impression is that it's very wide. While this makes it stable and able to carry lots of cargo, it'll make it sail like a dog. Definitely a boat only for inshore sailing and short voyages. Slimming it down one square would make it more seaworthy, at the expense of cargo capacity (see also rowing later) The mast is a bit too far in front, the best placement (with a single mast) is just a little bit in front of the centre. Move it back at least one (possibly two) squares. Most of the wind pressure will be from the back, you need far stronger support ropes from the main mast fastened in the main body of the boat. You also need a smaller angle on these ropes, thus they need to be fastened further back on the boat. Finally, with a square sail (the "worst"/least advanced type of sail) you must be able to adjust the angle of attack for the sail, thus a separate rope and pulley (sp?) system for the sail is necessary. With a square sail you need oars, as these boats are almost impossible to sail upwind. However the ship is a bit big (and wide) for rowing, especially with only 6 oars (I assume 2 persons per oar). In addition the cabin hinders communication between the rowers on each side, making it very hard to coordinate. And you need something stable to sit on when rowing, which seems hard to do with your design. I would either have removed the oars completely (but then you need a different type of sail), put the oars below deck, or gone for a slimmer design without the cabin between the rowers. The cabin is a bit big for a ship this size, and with the mast in the middle you probably need to slim it a bit down and put it further back. I would also have put the entrance door on the short end, that seem to be the common arrangement on all boats I've been on (probably because it's easier to get a good layout of the cabin). All in all its not bad, it'll probably sail but not very well. The biggest goof is the mast (placement and support ropes), you need to fix that. Apart from that it depends on what you are aiming to use it for. It'll do for inshore trading, but if you want to go outshore (and longer voyages) you need either a slimmer boat with a better oar system, or a proper ship (i.e. larger). .Ziggy [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
[cartography] Is this vessel seaworthy?
Top