Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Casters Nerfed, Melee Ascendant (3.5)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Al" data-source="post: 915514" data-attributes="member: 2486"><p>I've almost never seen this done. In nearly every game I've played, the wizard has broadly steered clear of item creation, and even in those when he has, the party needs to make use of incidental downtime. Very rarely does a party willingly sit around whilst the wizard makes items- they would normally just buy it from an NPC. That's IME of course, but from the various threads on item creation rules, I think that that is probably the case in a plurality if not a majority of cases.</p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>Mass damage spells- nerfed due to higher monster HPs, worse Reflex DCs and/or nerfed outright (Horrid Wilting)</p><p>Planar travel and teleport spells- nerfed with shorter range.</p><p>Utility spells- the most common of which (the buffs) have been nerfed. </p><p></p><p>Yes, they did away the worst elements of 3e. Haste was justified, and I had already house ruled Harm (and Heal vs undead). Polymorph nerf I could live with, Hold I just about sucked up, but with the buffs, disintegrate, Horrid Wilting, GMW, etc. it became not merely rectification but ruination.</p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>Sure, spellcasters are still playable, if one is prepared to play a significantly weakened class. As for them having a LOT of spells, a LOT of spells are never used. Most of the nerfed spells are the ones used regularly by casters. If Sequester, Protection from Spells and Guards and Wards are still as powerful, this is hardly a compensation.</p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>Okay, 11th level caster vs. 11th level lich. Lich has +5 Fort save (assumes +2 cloak of resistance); caster has DC 22 (20 Int, Spell Focus, 6th level spell). Lich has touch AC of 17 (includes Mage Armour, Ring of Protection +2), caster has +6 to hit (Dex 13). Caster hits 50% of time, lich passes save 20% of time, so aggregate damage is a whopping 45 points of damage. The average lich has 72 points. In other words, no, hong, disintegrate can't kill the lich.</p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>Or fighting an intelligent opponent. Remember that coup de grace is a full-round action which provokes an AoO. Of course you can co-ordinate strategies, but in any event the DCs are going to be lower so a strategy based around Hold is far more likely to go awry.</p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>No, the reason that wizards are forced into melee is because the tanks charge them. Wizards are still dangerous, and coupled with low HPs and generally low AC, this makes them obvious targets.</p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>That's *exactly* the point. In 3.5e, it will therefore be more than 100 per round. Wizards can just about keep up, but they sacrifice HPs and AC just to do a comparable amount of damage. That's not a tradeoff. In 3e, wizards have better offensive capabilities but more obvious weaknesses; in 3.5e, the wizards have merely comparable offensive capabilities but retain their weaknesses. If WotC wants the nerfed wizard in offense, it should give some defensive compensation, such as a higher hit dice or possibly light armour proficiency.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Al, post: 915514, member: 2486"] I've almost never seen this done. In nearly every game I've played, the wizard has broadly steered clear of item creation, and even in those when he has, the party needs to make use of incidental downtime. Very rarely does a party willingly sit around whilst the wizard makes items- they would normally just buy it from an NPC. That's IME of course, but from the various threads on item creation rules, I think that that is probably the case in a plurality if not a majority of cases. Mass damage spells- nerfed due to higher monster HPs, worse Reflex DCs and/or nerfed outright (Horrid Wilting) Planar travel and teleport spells- nerfed with shorter range. Utility spells- the most common of which (the buffs) have been nerfed. Yes, they did away the worst elements of 3e. Haste was justified, and I had already house ruled Harm (and Heal vs undead). Polymorph nerf I could live with, Hold I just about sucked up, but with the buffs, disintegrate, Horrid Wilting, GMW, etc. it became not merely rectification but ruination. Sure, spellcasters are still playable, if one is prepared to play a significantly weakened class. As for them having a LOT of spells, a LOT of spells are never used. Most of the nerfed spells are the ones used regularly by casters. If Sequester, Protection from Spells and Guards and Wards are still as powerful, this is hardly a compensation. Okay, 11th level caster vs. 11th level lich. Lich has +5 Fort save (assumes +2 cloak of resistance); caster has DC 22 (20 Int, Spell Focus, 6th level spell). Lich has touch AC of 17 (includes Mage Armour, Ring of Protection +2), caster has +6 to hit (Dex 13). Caster hits 50% of time, lich passes save 20% of time, so aggregate damage is a whopping 45 points of damage. The average lich has 72 points. In other words, no, hong, disintegrate can't kill the lich. Or fighting an intelligent opponent. Remember that coup de grace is a full-round action which provokes an AoO. Of course you can co-ordinate strategies, but in any event the DCs are going to be lower so a strategy based around Hold is far more likely to go awry. No, the reason that wizards are forced into melee is because the tanks charge them. Wizards are still dangerous, and coupled with low HPs and generally low AC, this makes them obvious targets. That's *exactly* the point. In 3.5e, it will therefore be more than 100 per round. Wizards can just about keep up, but they sacrifice HPs and AC just to do a comparable amount of damage. That's not a tradeoff. In 3e, wizards have better offensive capabilities but more obvious weaknesses; in 3.5e, the wizards have merely comparable offensive capabilities but retain their weaknesses. If WotC wants the nerfed wizard in offense, it should give some defensive compensation, such as a higher hit dice or possibly light armour proficiency. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Casters Nerfed, Melee Ascendant (3.5)
Top