Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Casters Nerfed, Melee Ascendant (3.5)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Al" data-source="post: 919464" data-attributes="member: 2486"><p>Well, for an 11th level wizard, I'd say that 2 6th level spells is probably pretty close to 20% of his resources. If the lich wins initiative, the wizard will be spending a lot more.</p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>Nerfed.</p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>Nerfed.</p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>Having seen your exchange with E_B, I'd add two points.</p><p>1. Your wizard is using a *lot* of supplements</p><p>2. You forgot to account for secondary targets taking half damage (even empowered, 12d6 is unlikely to take out a 14th level wiz)</p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>Nerfed.</p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>Okay. Increase damage by average of 4 points. Not a huge difference.</p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>Assessing the overall utility of a spell by taking the *weakest*. That's right- the weakest. Not 'weak', not 'quite weak', but the weakest. No other major DnD opponents has a Fort save as poor as a lich for its CR.</p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>I think this is the crux of the problem. The most vocal DnD lobby are those who are the most 'serious' gamers (since they're the ones discussing spells for hours on message boards <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />). WotC therefore react to this vocal lobby, who by virtue of being 'serious' gamers, tend to possess supplements. WotC therefore modify DnD based on a disproportionate and unrepresentative feedback. Core rules should not be 'backwardly-compatible' to assume people use supplements. They should be stand-alone, and the *supplements* should be toned down, not the core rules. That's utterly wrong-headed.</p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>Er...so your wizard who has spent four feats pumping out his ability to do Disintegrate (Spell Focus, GSF, WF(Ray), PBS) is not going to either use Disintegrate or be somehow hampered from soaking so many resources into the primary aim of maximising that spell. Opportunity cost, d00d.</p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>Nonsense, and double-nonsense with melee brutes. A melee brute cannot take down a melee brute in one round unless it's a smacked-out build, has Power Critical with a huge multiplier weapon or uses a CDG. By 13th level, any self-respecting melee brute should have coming close to 130 hit points, far more than a 13th level tank can dish out in one round.</p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>Sure, if the fighters are going to sit there and not do much. The difference between the wizard and the held victim is that given the new hold, it will wear off reasonably quickly (or be dispelled or whatever). Then the fighters can go back on the offensive. PC fighters are not to attack as a human shield for the wizard on a permanent basis, even if they are happy to do it for a held victim for a round or so.</p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>Do I detect a snipe <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin :D" data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" /> ?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Al, post: 919464, member: 2486"] Well, for an 11th level wizard, I'd say that 2 6th level spells is probably pretty close to 20% of his resources. If the lich wins initiative, the wizard will be spending a lot more. Nerfed. Nerfed. Having seen your exchange with E_B, I'd add two points. 1. Your wizard is using a *lot* of supplements 2. You forgot to account for secondary targets taking half damage (even empowered, 12d6 is unlikely to take out a 14th level wiz) Nerfed. Okay. Increase damage by average of 4 points. Not a huge difference. Assessing the overall utility of a spell by taking the *weakest*. That's right- the weakest. Not 'weak', not 'quite weak', but the weakest. No other major DnD opponents has a Fort save as poor as a lich for its CR. I think this is the crux of the problem. The most vocal DnD lobby are those who are the most 'serious' gamers (since they're the ones discussing spells for hours on message boards :)). WotC therefore react to this vocal lobby, who by virtue of being 'serious' gamers, tend to possess supplements. WotC therefore modify DnD based on a disproportionate and unrepresentative feedback. Core rules should not be 'backwardly-compatible' to assume people use supplements. They should be stand-alone, and the *supplements* should be toned down, not the core rules. That's utterly wrong-headed. Er...so your wizard who has spent four feats pumping out his ability to do Disintegrate (Spell Focus, GSF, WF(Ray), PBS) is not going to either use Disintegrate or be somehow hampered from soaking so many resources into the primary aim of maximising that spell. Opportunity cost, d00d. Nonsense, and double-nonsense with melee brutes. A melee brute cannot take down a melee brute in one round unless it's a smacked-out build, has Power Critical with a huge multiplier weapon or uses a CDG. By 13th level, any self-respecting melee brute should have coming close to 130 hit points, far more than a 13th level tank can dish out in one round. Sure, if the fighters are going to sit there and not do much. The difference between the wizard and the held victim is that given the new hold, it will wear off reasonably quickly (or be dispelled or whatever). Then the fighters can go back on the offensive. PC fighters are not to attack as a human shield for the wizard on a permanent basis, even if they are happy to do it for a held victim for a round or so. Do I detect a snipe :D ? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Casters Nerfed, Melee Ascendant (3.5)
Top