Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Gammadoodler" data-source="post: 8489734" data-attributes="member: 6914290">Sorry. Don't actually know what you are saying here.If I'm parsing it anywhere close (and please correct me if i am not), you think it makes more sense to place the burden of correcting class imbalance on the gm rather than the game designers, with a failure to do so serving as an example of &quot;reprehensible bad&quot; gm-ing.And you think that shifting this burden back to game designers makes it &quot;not D&amp;D&quot; and non-specifically harms players who are &quot;playing D&amp;D&quot; with non-reprehensible gms.I do not get this line of reasoning..like at all. Non-reprehensible gms have no issues picking up the slack for missing class power but for some reason are ill-equipped to handle balanced capabilities??And further.. Players engaging in the same adventures, using the same abilities as they were getting from a set of magic weapons/armor, are no longer playing D&amp;D just because their wardrobe is now described a little differently?? What?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Gammadoodler, post: 8489734, member: 6914290"] Sorry. Don't actually know what you are saying here. If I'm parsing it anywhere close (and please correct me if i am not), you think it makes more sense to place the burden of correcting class imbalance on the gm rather than the game designers, with a failure to do so serving as an example of "reprehensible bad" gm-ing. And you think that shifting this burden back to game designers makes it "not D&D" and non-specifically harms players who are "playing D&D" with non-reprehensible gms. I do not get this line of reasoning..like at all. Non-reprehensible gms have no issues picking up the slack for missing class power but for some reason are ill-equipped to handle balanced capabilities?? And further.. Players engaging in the same adventures, using the same abilities as they were getting from a set of magic weapons/armor, are no longer playing D&D just because their wardrobe is now described a little differently?? What? [/QUOTE]

Verification