Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Casters vs Martials: Part 2 - The Mundane Limit
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="bert1001 fka bert1000" data-source="post: 8496393" data-attributes="member: 7029588"><p>Sure, but it got conflated with the notion of balancing this "action hero" with full spellcasters.</p><p></p><p>So if it's -- How much can we push the power of martials but still leave them "mundane" in flavor? And we don't care if the "action hero" ever gets near full spell caster power, agency, and solution to challanges. We just want the "action hero" better than the current martials and better emulate some the "action hero stuff" we see in fiction. </p><p></p><p>Then I think it's very doable. Although I still argue that embracing a bigger toolbox would be even better to do this. </p><p></p><p>This will unfortunately still be difficult to crowd source because even if you get people to play within these parameters, there are people that are putting further parameters on the design that I don't think you are envisioning. Hence the pushback on your OP and those abilties "just being spells" by several posters even if they can be rationaled in the fiction as action hero/mundane effects.</p><p></p><p>Anyway, I will try to get out of the way now unless I have specific comments on proposed abilities or suggestions for abilities that fit the parameters of</p><p></p><p>1) enhancing the power of martials but still leave them "mundane" or "action hero" in flavor</p><p>2) want the class better than the current martials, but don't care if it ends up being much lower powered than current full spellcasters</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I disagree that just because some people are against the notion of mythic martials that it shouldn't exist as an option. Given the existance of the mythic D&D spellcaster and fictional examples of mythic martials as inspiration for the earliest D&D, it has a good reason to exist in the game as an option both from a game balance and historical D&D perspective (fulfiling the rhetorical promise from earlier editions). People can ignore the option but there isn't really any good reason to deny it to others who want it. But of course, discussion on the creation of that mythical martial does not have to be this thread.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="bert1001 fka bert1000, post: 8496393, member: 7029588"] Sure, but it got conflated with the notion of balancing this "action hero" with full spellcasters. So if it's -- How much can we push the power of martials but still leave them "mundane" in flavor? And we don't care if the "action hero" ever gets near full spell caster power, agency, and solution to challanges. We just want the "action hero" better than the current martials and better emulate some the "action hero stuff" we see in fiction. Then I think it's very doable. Although I still argue that embracing a bigger toolbox would be even better to do this. This will unfortunately still be difficult to crowd source because even if you get people to play within these parameters, there are people that are putting further parameters on the design that I don't think you are envisioning. Hence the pushback on your OP and those abilties "just being spells" by several posters even if they can be rationaled in the fiction as action hero/mundane effects. Anyway, I will try to get out of the way now unless I have specific comments on proposed abilities or suggestions for abilities that fit the parameters of 1) enhancing the power of martials but still leave them "mundane" or "action hero" in flavor 2) want the class better than the current martials, but don't care if it ends up being much lower powered than current full spellcasters I disagree that just because some people are against the notion of mythic martials that it shouldn't exist as an option. Given the existance of the mythic D&D spellcaster and fictional examples of mythic martials as inspiration for the earliest D&D, it has a good reason to exist in the game as an option both from a game balance and historical D&D perspective (fulfiling the rhetorical promise from earlier editions). People can ignore the option but there isn't really any good reason to deny it to others who want it. But of course, discussion on the creation of that mythical martial does not have to be this thread. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Casters vs Martials: Part 2 - The Mundane Limit
Top