Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Casters vs. non-casters in your game.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dannyalcatraz" data-source="post: 5523059" data-attributes="member: 19675"><p>In 34 years of gaming, I've never seen it in person.</p><p></p><p>Just looking at my current main gaming group- together since 1998- I can't say if its because of conscious effort or not, but everyone is playing the PC they want to the way they want to.</p><p></p><p>Personally, I play a lot of casters, but I design them to be consistent with the PC's own internal drives; they research and learn the spells that have elements that speak to them in particular. This means my PCs look a lot different from the "optimized" PCs you see on the boards. For example, I've only designed one caster in all these years who had Magic Missile on his list, and he was "specialized" in Force spells.</p><p></p><p>Contrast that to my buddy who nearly always plays Wizards- 80+% of his D&D characters are of that class. Up until his 4Ed cold-themed mage, you would find the spell list of his casters not only interchangeable from one to the other, but damn close to the lists you'll find online. Even so, though, he doesn't overshadow other players the way some might expect because of his playstyle. An old-school gamer like me, he always holds power in reserve, much like a RW military commander, because he knows spells are precious resources and often the key to victory. So instead of casting every round, he casts only enough to tip the combat irrevocably in the party's favor, then waits. This isn't out of some sense of letting others shine, but rather out of recognition that a serious challenge can arise at any moment...and if he's out of spells, "serious" could become "terminal."</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dannyalcatraz, post: 5523059, member: 19675"] In 34 years of gaming, I've never seen it in person. Just looking at my current main gaming group- together since 1998- I can't say if its because of conscious effort or not, but everyone is playing the PC they want to the way they want to. Personally, I play a lot of casters, but I design them to be consistent with the PC's own internal drives; they research and learn the spells that have elements that speak to them in particular. This means my PCs look a lot different from the "optimized" PCs you see on the boards. For example, I've only designed one caster in all these years who had Magic Missile on his list, and he was "specialized" in Force spells. Contrast that to my buddy who nearly always plays Wizards- 80+% of his D&D characters are of that class. Up until his 4Ed cold-themed mage, you would find the spell list of his casters not only interchangeable from one to the other, but damn close to the lists you'll find online. Even so, though, he doesn't overshadow other players the way some might expect because of his playstyle. An old-school gamer like me, he always holds power in reserve, much like a RW military commander, because he knows spells are precious resources and often the key to victory. So instead of casting every round, he casts only enough to tip the combat irrevocably in the party's favor, then waits. This isn't out of some sense of letting others shine, but rather out of recognition that a serious challenge can arise at any moment...and if he's out of spells, "serious" could become "terminal." [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Casters vs. non-casters in your game.
Top