Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
Casting Defensivly - 3.5 rules
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="swrushing" data-source="post: 1420295" data-attributes="member: 14140"><p>IMo bab of attacker and such have no impact on the dc for the chek and no relevence.</p><p></p><p>Whether or not you get an AoO is not an issue of BAB. A +15 to hit guy has as much chance to get an AoO as a -4 to hit guy. They both get them if and only if the enemy drops his guard. Their skill and prowess and technique and gruesome visage have nothing whatsoever to do with it. Their skill prowes etc do not provoke aoos.</p><p></p><p>When casting on the defensive, the mage has already decided to not concentrate on the spell enough to cause any guard dropping. Regardles of the roll, or his skill at concentration, or any other factor at all... their is no AoO. Their is no opening for an extra attack. their is no swing for bab to matter. </p><p></p><p>All that remains is... "can i get this spell off without the concentration and distraction i would normally use?"</p><p></p><p>Low level casters, they have a tough time meeting that dc15+spell. Midlevel casters get easier and higher than that its a given... <strong>IF the caster spent enough skills to max the concentration skill.</strong></p><p></p><p>that doesn't seem wrong to me in the slightest. </p><p></p><p>Think of it this way... </p><p></p><p>low level casters are very distracted by casting spells. It is a touygh mental task for them and they lose focus on other events.</p><p>for those casters <strong>who decide to work at it</strong>, spending their time on "casting prowess" (concentration) instead of knowledge undead and knowledge arcanum and alchemy, they can cut down this distraction and by enem lower high levels get to the point that casting a spell is instinctive and not really a distraction at all. of course, their comrades who did not focus their studies this way have other areas of knowledge that the now instinctive caster lacks.</p><p></p><p>This doesn't feel wrong to me.</p><p></p><p>Its kind of the skill equivalent of one caster spending feats on spell focus and craft while another spends on silent spell and still spell...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="swrushing, post: 1420295, member: 14140"] IMo bab of attacker and such have no impact on the dc for the chek and no relevence. Whether or not you get an AoO is not an issue of BAB. A +15 to hit guy has as much chance to get an AoO as a -4 to hit guy. They both get them if and only if the enemy drops his guard. Their skill and prowess and technique and gruesome visage have nothing whatsoever to do with it. Their skill prowes etc do not provoke aoos. When casting on the defensive, the mage has already decided to not concentrate on the spell enough to cause any guard dropping. Regardles of the roll, or his skill at concentration, or any other factor at all... their is no AoO. Their is no opening for an extra attack. their is no swing for bab to matter. All that remains is... "can i get this spell off without the concentration and distraction i would normally use?" Low level casters, they have a tough time meeting that dc15+spell. Midlevel casters get easier and higher than that its a given... [b]IF the caster spent enough skills to max the concentration skill.[/b] that doesn't seem wrong to me in the slightest. Think of it this way... low level casters are very distracted by casting spells. It is a touygh mental task for them and they lose focus on other events. for those casters [b]who decide to work at it[/b], spending their time on "casting prowess" (concentration) instead of knowledge undead and knowledge arcanum and alchemy, they can cut down this distraction and by enem lower high levels get to the point that casting a spell is instinctive and not really a distraction at all. of course, their comrades who did not focus their studies this way have other areas of knowledge that the now instinctive caster lacks. This doesn't feel wrong to me. Its kind of the skill equivalent of one caster spending feats on spell focus and craft while another spends on silent spell and still spell... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
Casting Defensivly - 3.5 rules
Top