Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Casting multiple spells with bonus spells and the order they are cast.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="CapnZapp" data-source="post: 7231044" data-attributes="member: 12731"><p>No, you don't get to bundle together a lot of stuff. You don't get to shift the goalposts.</p><p></p><p>We are not discussing traps. We are not discussing vaguely unclear statements "and a number of other sage advice articles". </p><p></p><p>Please read the supplied tweet. I ask you to argue exactly what's so unclear about it. </p><p></p><p>Saying it doesn't revolve around "reaction casting" <em>when that's the most clear aspect of it</em> doesn't cut it.</p><p></p><p>At some point even you must realize how little you have that is actually talking in your favor. If all you can point to is one out of four interpretations of "interrupt" you have... very little. Other "arguments" are not really arguments. For instance, the sentiment "it's absurd how this rule would deny spellcasters but not fighters their reaction". That's arguing why the RAW is bad and should be changed (and we don't disagree), not whether it's RAW or not! </p><p></p><p>In short, you need to stop denying our arguments. You must supply more of your own. Otherwise you need to draw the conclusion it is overwhelmingly unlikely you are right. </p><p></p><p>Or that you <strong>want</strong> to be right, badly enough to make you ignore some of the evidence.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="CapnZapp, post: 7231044, member: 12731"] No, you don't get to bundle together a lot of stuff. You don't get to shift the goalposts. We are not discussing traps. We are not discussing vaguely unclear statements "and a number of other sage advice articles". Please read the supplied tweet. I ask you to argue exactly what's so unclear about it. Saying it doesn't revolve around "reaction casting" [I]when that's the most clear aspect of it[/I] doesn't cut it. At some point even you must realize how little you have that is actually talking in your favor. If all you can point to is one out of four interpretations of "interrupt" you have... very little. Other "arguments" are not really arguments. For instance, the sentiment "it's absurd how this rule would deny spellcasters but not fighters their reaction". That's arguing why the RAW is bad and should be changed (and we don't disagree), not whether it's RAW or not! In short, you need to stop denying our arguments. You must supply more of your own. Otherwise you need to draw the conclusion it is overwhelmingly unlikely you are right. Or that you [B]want[/B] to be right, badly enough to make you ignore some of the evidence. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Casting multiple spells with bonus spells and the order they are cast.
Top