Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Caliban" data-source="post: 7231155" data-attributes="member: 284">A) The sneak attack stuff is irrelevant, since this is about a rule that specifically limits spellcasting.&nbsp; &nbsp; It only becomes relevant if you are claiming that reactions are not part of a turn - in which case, the sneak attack stuff proves that claim is incorrect. B) You are taking two different Sage Advice questions and treating them as if the answer to one applies to the other.&nbsp;&nbsp; That's just plain wrong. C) I've already quoted Jeremy Crawford explicitly stating how it works.&nbsp; Everyone conveniently ignores that statement, but here it is, yet another time.&nbsp;&nbsp; If you want all the relevant links, go find my original post: &nbsp;There's even a follow up question referring to the Sage Advice article you are quoting. He says it doesn't change his answer.&nbsp; (Just to show he can still be incredibly vague when it suits him. <img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/erm.png"&nbsp; class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":erm:" title="Erm&nbsp; &nbsp; :erm:" data-shortname=":erm:" /> )Edit: And I took too long writing this post. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f61b.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":p" title="Stick out tongue&nbsp; &nbsp; :p"&nbsp; data-smilie="7"data-shortname=":p" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="Caliban, post: 7231155, member: 284"] A) The sneak attack stuff is irrelevant, since this is about a rule that specifically limits spellcasting. It only becomes relevant if you are claiming that reactions are not part of a turn - in which case, the sneak attack stuff proves that claim is incorrect. B) You are taking two different Sage Advice questions and treating them as if the answer to one applies to the other. That's just plain wrong. C) I've already quoted Jeremy Crawford explicitly stating how it works. Everyone conveniently ignores that statement, but here it is, yet another time. If you want all the relevant links, go find my original post: There's even a follow up question referring to the Sage Advice article you are quoting. He says it doesn't change his answer. (Just to show he can still be incredibly vague when it suits him. :erm: ) Edit: And I took too long writing this post. :p [/QUOTE]

Verification