Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Casting on the Defensive -- Opposed Roll?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Aluvial" data-source="post: 966694" data-attributes="member: 6862"><p>The other night I started to question the ability to cast on the defensive. In many instances, it seems like a caster would always try this alternative than risking an AoO. </p><p></p><p>At a DC of 15 + spell level, this Concentration check is easily made by many mid level casters for their various spells. </p><p></p><p>Yes, there is a risk of failure, but with a minimal bonus for Constitution, say a +1, and the maximum ranks you can dump into it, a 9th level caster can get a +13 on this roll. Not to shabby. </p><p></p><p>It basically allows you to cast spells at anytime without to much fear of being smacked.</p><p></p><p></p><p>I propose the opposed roll for this. I'm not sure if this has come up before, but this is the method my players and I came up with recently.</p><p></p><p><strong>Basically the caster needs to make a Opposed Check, His Concentration check minus the spell level versus the opponent (who has a AoO left) Attack Roll. </strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong>If the Caster is higher, no chance for AoO. If the Attacker is higher than roll again for the AoO attempt and follow the rules as normal.</strong></p><p></p><p>What do you guys think? Is there another solution?</p><p></p><p>Aluvial</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Aluvial, post: 966694, member: 6862"] The other night I started to question the ability to cast on the defensive. In many instances, it seems like a caster would always try this alternative than risking an AoO. At a DC of 15 + spell level, this Concentration check is easily made by many mid level casters for their various spells. Yes, there is a risk of failure, but with a minimal bonus for Constitution, say a +1, and the maximum ranks you can dump into it, a 9th level caster can get a +13 on this roll. Not to shabby. It basically allows you to cast spells at anytime without to much fear of being smacked. I propose the opposed roll for this. I'm not sure if this has come up before, but this is the method my players and I came up with recently. [b]Basically the caster needs to make a Opposed Check, His Concentration check minus the spell level versus the opponent (who has a AoO left) Attack Roll. If the Caster is higher, no chance for AoO. If the Attacker is higher than roll again for the AoO attempt and follow the rules as normal.[/b] What do you guys think? Is there another solution? Aluvial [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Casting on the Defensive -- Opposed Roll?
Top