Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Magus_Jerel" data-source="post: 141303" data-attributes="member: 3940">Still doesn't answer the question concerning the last sentence of paragraph six.These creatures SLA's or Su abilities may be temporarily nullified by the field.note it does not say HAS to be nullified.I'll admit - a better wording is the following:These creatures SLA's or Su abilites, however, are still subject to nullification by the AMF.Problem is - this is a rules forum, and we are dealing only with the exact text.  With the word splice that you are discussing - I am confronted with deciding wether or not a given creature's DR is a function of "instant healing" and thus prevented, or "ability to ignore such a slight blow" - so that no real "damage" was done in the first place.I don't like the ambiguity this allows in the least.  I am inclined to agree with you - for the sake of play balance.  The problem is - the interpretation that DR is NOT negated is still potentially valid - wether correct for the sake of balance or not.I would much rather remove that possibility; I have seen way too much rules lawyering in my time as a GM.</blockquote>