Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Turanil" data-source="post: 1716303" data-attributes="member: 9646">Thanks for the response. In fact the response seems clear, and the system looks dubious to me. With 1d20 + level + ability modifier, a DC of 12 or 18 is going to be easy to succeed. As such, the obvious houserule here is to have: prime ability = +6 (I would rather opt for +4) bonus to the check; appropriate class = + level, while other class = + half-level; (lets add a +3 or +2 bonus if the character has an apprpriate background); then the CK sets a DC as in d20 and lets roll the d20. Okay, I will see when I get my boxed set. For what I understand, this is a game for CK to throw in their houserules...Another thing: I note 15 = +1 bonus; 16 = +2; 17 = +3; 18 = +4. Well, at least in the 3e where it is 12-13, 14-15, 16-17, and 18-19, players were less incited to cheat to come up with uber stats. I remember those time when nobody wanted to play a fighter with less than 17 strength...</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Turanil, post: 1716303, member: 9646"] Thanks for the response. In fact the response seems clear, and the system looks dubious to me. With 1d20 + level + ability modifier, a DC of 12 or 18 is going to be easy to succeed. As such, the obvious houserule here is to have: prime ability = +6 (I would rather opt for +4) bonus to the check; appropriate class = + level, while other class = + half-level; (lets add a +3 or +2 bonus if the character has an apprpriate background); then the CK sets a DC as in d20 and lets roll the d20. Okay, I will see when I get my boxed set. For what I understand, this is a game for CK to throw in their houserules... Another thing: I note 15 = +1 bonus; 16 = +2; 17 = +3; 18 = +4. Well, at least in the 3e where it is 12-13, 14-15, 16-17, and 18-19, players were less incited to cheat to come up with uber stats. I remember those time when nobody wanted to play a fighter with less than 17 strength... [/QUOTE]

Verification