Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Omote" data-source="post: 2352049" data-attributes="member: 18961">I CK (DM) a "off and on" game of CASTLES & CRUSADES right now (mainly because I've got so many other v3.5 games going on at the moment).I can tell you this much, as it's been said numerous time before but when you want to play and RPG fast with slick, easy to understnad rules, C&C is my game.  IMO it's too hard to play a pick up game of v3.5, and I've actually converted a few players that like v3.5, but want to play a more basic game (RCD&D).  I convinced them that instead of playing out of the Rules Cyclopedia, give C&C a try.  Both of them seemed to like the intuitive level of the C&C mechanic when it combines "basic" level D&D, with the more popular d20 mechanics.I'm going to be kicking off a true C&C campaign rather soon.  I honestly thought that I would only get 2-4 players at most.  I can say that I'm pleasently surprised that as of today I have 7 people who are interested in playing!  To me that says somthing about the "closeness" many D&Ders feel to a more classical style of play.  ~  Don't get me wrong, I still love v3.5, and am currently playing/running in 3 weekly games, but there is something about C&C that seems to call out to more and more players.To ease the transition, I;ve incorporated a simply Skill and Feat system into my C&C game.  Honestly I can say that both these systems only took a few sessions of play-testing and a few hours of work to prepare and works very well.  I think most players will like the ease of adaptibity to C&C.I say, Crusade on!............................................OmoteFPQ</blockquote>

Verification