Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Cat has "Weapons Expertise" with its Claws?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Hriston" data-source="post: 6475646" data-attributes="member: 6787503"><p>Dear Paul,</p><p></p><p>Your insistence that others follow a loosey-goosey play-style ignores the fact that 5e was written for ALL play-styles. Here you are again telling me that I'm not allowed to think a certain way when I consider how things work in this game because that's on a need-to-know basis somehow. It isn't an issue of whether I need to know why they gave the Cat this or that bonus. I'm perfectly capable of forgetting about any of this and just playing the game as-written. For some people, and you may not be one of them, contemplation of the rules and mechanics of the game are a subject of interest in and of itself. In a forum such as this I would expect to find many such people. I don't see how shutting down such discussions with a claim that they are inappropriate or even detrimental to the enjoyment of the game is at all constructive. I know it was made up. My interest in this discussion is why they made it up the way they did and what are the implications that can be drawn from such decisions when considered within the larger framework of the game as a whole. The assertion that you seem to be making, that there is no such framework, is deeply unsatisfying to me as an explanation of design elements. As I said above, I've never played 3rd or 4th edition. Most of my experience has been with AD&D, and as you may know, the design of monsters in that edition is far less rational than what I've seen in 5e. So please don't pretend that you are the only person who understands the intent behind the design of 5e. Also, I find your suggestion that I put a time limit on inquiries into the rules at my table to be dismissive. If you wish to suppress discussion of the rules in your own games, go right ahead. I will follow no such rule, and I don't see the point of carrying over an impatience with such inquiries into a discussion forum whose sole intent it is to discuss the game.</p><p></p><p>Thanks,</p><p>Hriston</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Hriston, post: 6475646, member: 6787503"] Dear Paul, Your insistence that others follow a loosey-goosey play-style ignores the fact that 5e was written for ALL play-styles. Here you are again telling me that I'm not allowed to think a certain way when I consider how things work in this game because that's on a need-to-know basis somehow. It isn't an issue of whether I need to know why they gave the Cat this or that bonus. I'm perfectly capable of forgetting about any of this and just playing the game as-written. For some people, and you may not be one of them, contemplation of the rules and mechanics of the game are a subject of interest in and of itself. In a forum such as this I would expect to find many such people. I don't see how shutting down such discussions with a claim that they are inappropriate or even detrimental to the enjoyment of the game is at all constructive. I know it was made up. My interest in this discussion is why they made it up the way they did and what are the implications that can be drawn from such decisions when considered within the larger framework of the game as a whole. The assertion that you seem to be making, that there is no such framework, is deeply unsatisfying to me as an explanation of design elements. As I said above, I've never played 3rd or 4th edition. Most of my experience has been with AD&D, and as you may know, the design of monsters in that edition is far less rational than what I've seen in 5e. So please don't pretend that you are the only person who understands the intent behind the design of 5e. Also, I find your suggestion that I put a time limit on inquiries into the rules at my table to be dismissive. If you wish to suppress discussion of the rules in your own games, go right ahead. I will follow no such rule, and I don't see the point of carrying over an impatience with such inquiries into a discussion forum whose sole intent it is to discuss the game. Thanks, Hriston [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Cat has "Weapons Expertise" with its Claws?
Top