Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
CB's biggest failing by far: No custom content possible
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="KidSnide" data-source="post: 5587543" data-attributes="member: 54710"><p>To my mind the problem isn't one of software implementation, but one of prioritization. It used to me that a <em>normal</em> game involved a decent variety of custom magic items, and many games included some custom races or spells. Despite this, WotC decided that supporting its constantly flowing stream of new published rules was more important that supporting these custom rules elements. It's a reasonable business decision, but - IMO - it has had a strong negative effect on the hobby.</p><p></p><p>The problem is that the CB is a very useful tool for smoothing a character creation process that is quite challenging for many players. Because it doesn't support these basic level of GM creativity, it discourages new GMs from running non-standard settings, or even creating the occasional item, power or feat that helps tie the mechanics to the individual quirks of the setting. Of course, any GM can still run whatever they want and forgo use of the CB, but that forces their players to go through the more complicated process of creating characters by hand. Quite reasonably, many GMs choose to give up their customizations instead of forcing their players to go through a more arduous character creation procedure.</p><p></p><p>Quite simply, providing an incentive for GMs to give up the customizations that helped make their games unique has changed the hobby. And, IMO, the change is not for the better.</p><p></p><p>-KS</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="KidSnide, post: 5587543, member: 54710"] To my mind the problem isn't one of software implementation, but one of prioritization. It used to me that a [i]normal[/i] game involved a decent variety of custom magic items, and many games included some custom races or spells. Despite this, WotC decided that supporting its constantly flowing stream of new published rules was more important that supporting these custom rules elements. It's a reasonable business decision, but - IMO - it has had a strong negative effect on the hobby. The problem is that the CB is a very useful tool for smoothing a character creation process that is quite challenging for many players. Because it doesn't support these basic level of GM creativity, it discourages new GMs from running non-standard settings, or even creating the occasional item, power or feat that helps tie the mechanics to the individual quirks of the setting. Of course, any GM can still run whatever they want and forgo use of the CB, but that forces their players to go through the more complicated process of creating characters by hand. Quite reasonably, many GMs choose to give up their customizations instead of forcing their players to go through a more arduous character creation procedure. Quite simply, providing an incentive for GMs to give up the customizations that helped make their games unique has changed the hobby. And, IMO, the change is not for the better. -KS [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
CB's biggest failing by far: No custom content possible
Top