Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
CB's biggest failing by far: No custom content possible
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Riastlin" data-source="post: 5587559" data-attributes="member: 94022"><p>The problem though is that when WotC does finally implement support for "custom content" it has to be more than just custom religions and languages. Quite frankly, given the history that has been shown by the forum goers, etc., were WotC to implement this new "feature" that allows you to put in your own language and religion, there would be a huge outcry about how clueless WotC is. </p><p> </p><p>People would complain that this is a slap in the face for all of us homebrewers out there. That this "fix" or "support" is anything but. After all, the easiest piece of the CB to put your own "stuff" in for is likely the languages and religions. I mean seriously, how hard is it to draw a line through "Bahamut" and write in "Captain Awesome"? That would be the arguments and rants. Frankly, as somebody who is running a campaign that his some of its own homebrewed deities, I would not really consider this as being something "new" or even helpful for the CB.</p><p> </p><p>WotC won't be given credit for having accounted for "custom" content until we can put in our own feats, with their own Pre-Reqs and our own powers, items, etc. Further, people really want these custom entries to then also "do the math" on the power cards. After all, the power cards are, in my opinion, far and away the best feature of the CB, particularly since they "do the math" for us -- albeit occasionally incorrectly.</p><p> </p><p>Should the online CB have initially been designed with an option in language/religion for "Other --" that then had you write in on the sheet what that "other" was? Yeah, it probably should have. That would be the easiest fix and is seemingly something that would have been obvious from the get go. Even with that though, while I agree it would be nice for "Captain Awesome" to print out nice and neat in the same font as everything else on the religion line, I don't consider that an issue. Now, not having particularly decent means for implementing my own custom items into the CB is a much bigger issue for me and my players. It would make it a lot easier and a lot more useable if they could put in the artifact that they have received, etc. </p><p> </p><p>Like it or not, WotC is learning from history here. They know that if they bring us a "half-arsed" implementation, even if they explain that they are still working on the other half, that there will be a great hue and cry on the assorted boards.</p><p> </p><p>/shrug</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Riastlin, post: 5587559, member: 94022"] The problem though is that when WotC does finally implement support for "custom content" it has to be more than just custom religions and languages. Quite frankly, given the history that has been shown by the forum goers, etc., were WotC to implement this new "feature" that allows you to put in your own language and religion, there would be a huge outcry about how clueless WotC is. People would complain that this is a slap in the face for all of us homebrewers out there. That this "fix" or "support" is anything but. After all, the easiest piece of the CB to put your own "stuff" in for is likely the languages and religions. I mean seriously, how hard is it to draw a line through "Bahamut" and write in "Captain Awesome"? That would be the arguments and rants. Frankly, as somebody who is running a campaign that his some of its own homebrewed deities, I would not really consider this as being something "new" or even helpful for the CB. WotC won't be given credit for having accounted for "custom" content until we can put in our own feats, with their own Pre-Reqs and our own powers, items, etc. Further, people really want these custom entries to then also "do the math" on the power cards. After all, the power cards are, in my opinion, far and away the best feature of the CB, particularly since they "do the math" for us -- albeit occasionally incorrectly. Should the online CB have initially been designed with an option in language/religion for "Other --" that then had you write in on the sheet what that "other" was? Yeah, it probably should have. That would be the easiest fix and is seemingly something that would have been obvious from the get go. Even with that though, while I agree it would be nice for "Captain Awesome" to print out nice and neat in the same font as everything else on the religion line, I don't consider that an issue. Now, not having particularly decent means for implementing my own custom items into the CB is a much bigger issue for me and my players. It would make it a lot easier and a lot more useable if they could put in the artifact that they have received, etc. Like it or not, WotC is learning from history here. They know that if they bring us a "half-arsed" implementation, even if they explain that they are still working on the other half, that there will be a great hue and cry on the assorted boards. /shrug [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
CB's biggest failing by far: No custom content possible
Top