Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Samir" data-source="post: 4901402" data-attributes="member: 84965">"If it weren't this way it'd be broken" isn't necessarily an absolute. It could just mean that RAW it is broken and needs errata, but nobody really cares because the RAI is so obvious that it's a stretch to interpret it any other way.That's probably not the case here. But, for example, things that trigger off of pushing, pulling, or sliding someone don't trigger for each square pushed/pulled/slided--they trigger for the action. If Censure of Pursuit were the same way and triggered/stacked twice for a double move, or for having two Oaths of Enmity (relentless slayer, mighty enmity) both moving away, then it would be neither especially broken nor against the RAW.But you seem pretty sure about the if-then wording, so until I find a particularly convincing counterexample I'll be content with that.</blockquote>