Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
CHA, huh, what is it good for?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="grufflehead" data-source="post: 5376085" data-attributes="member: 35977"><p>Apologies to Edwin Starr for the thread title. </p><p></p><p>So, charisma - is it more trouble than it is worth? Many game systems don't have a CHA stat and handle how the PCs interact socially with the world in other ways, often more abstract. Others have no stat, but still have skills or abilities which handle specific types of interaction e.g. Persuasion, Fast Talking etc.</p><p></p><p>On one of my periodic forays onto the parts of the Paizo boards which don't involve play by post games, I constantly find myself having to get up, walk around and count to 20 when I see the word 'optimise' (the therapy seems to be paying off as the word 'viable' no longer causes me to twitch uncontrollably...). So I decided to actually read a thread or two instead of reaching for something to gouge my eyeballs out. <a href="http://paizo.com/paizo/messageboards/paizoPublishing/pathfinder/pathfinderRPG/advice/practicalOptimizationMakeTheNumbersFitYourRoleplaying" target="_blank">This one</a> as it happens.</p><p></p><p>Now the OP (and many of the contributors) make their points intelligently and articulately. They are absolutely correct to state that 'optimised' PCs do not necessarily equal min/maxed PCs, and that optimised PCs can be roleplayed very well. I still take issue at the sentiment that non-optimised PCs are a leech on the others and therefore somehow less worthy of play, but don't let me go off on another tangent.</p><p></p><p>The OP has gone further by asking people for character concepts which s/he will then stat up using Pathfinder point buy. To save you the trouble of reading the thread, see if you can spot the common thread: </p><p></p><p>- 'a dashing handsome sort of hero who can woo the fair maiden, talk his way out of trouble, and tell when someone's pulling his leg?' CHA 7</p><p></p><p>- 'a rather strange lad?' CHA 7</p><p></p><p>- 'educated in history and archeology, and possibly arcana, but found that he enjoyed exploring musty tombs and using his practical skills over poring over dry books at the university' CHA 7</p><p></p><p>- 'terrorizes the land to drive people from sarenrae's worship' CHA 7</p><p></p><p>- 'He's gruff and taciturn for the most part' CHA 7</p><p></p><p>'But how can this be?' I hear you ask. Surely this campaign world is full of wart-ridden, social lepers who drool constantly and are as likely to punch you as say hello? Apparently not. It appears these people only comprise the ones for whom CHA doesn't give a mechanical benefit in their class. And better still, all they need to do to overcome their deeply, deeply unpleasant traits is... put ranks in Diplomacy, because with enough of them, you're just as good as someone with an 18 CHA!</p><p></p><p>Now, to try and be fair, you could just as well say that the guy with DEX 7 can put lots of points into Stealth and be ninja-like, or someone with an INT 7 could be the world expert on botany because of all those ranks in Knowledge (Nature). Problem is, none of these optimisation threads would countenance a DEX 7 because it affects your initiative, and Ref save, and AC etc. </p><p></p><p>So, if it doesn't mechanically affect anything other than CHA based spellcasters ability to cast more complicated spells, unlike all 5 other stats in the game, why is it still there? It's just a dump stat, and so the point buy idea becomes corrupted because it is no longer '15 pts' when anyone but the bard or sorcerer actually gets 19 pts - 15 plus the 4 extra they get for lowering their CHA to 7 - with absolutely no in game consequences. </p><p></p><p>Is there a workable alternative to handle social interaction that would let us finally wave CHA goodbye?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="grufflehead, post: 5376085, member: 35977"] Apologies to Edwin Starr for the thread title. So, charisma - is it more trouble than it is worth? Many game systems don't have a CHA stat and handle how the PCs interact socially with the world in other ways, often more abstract. Others have no stat, but still have skills or abilities which handle specific types of interaction e.g. Persuasion, Fast Talking etc. On one of my periodic forays onto the parts of the Paizo boards which don't involve play by post games, I constantly find myself having to get up, walk around and count to 20 when I see the word 'optimise' (the therapy seems to be paying off as the word 'viable' no longer causes me to twitch uncontrollably...). So I decided to actually read a thread or two instead of reaching for something to gouge my eyeballs out. [URL="http://paizo.com/paizo/messageboards/paizoPublishing/pathfinder/pathfinderRPG/advice/practicalOptimizationMakeTheNumbersFitYourRoleplaying"]This one[/URL] as it happens. Now the OP (and many of the contributors) make their points intelligently and articulately. They are absolutely correct to state that 'optimised' PCs do not necessarily equal min/maxed PCs, and that optimised PCs can be roleplayed very well. I still take issue at the sentiment that non-optimised PCs are a leech on the others and therefore somehow less worthy of play, but don't let me go off on another tangent. The OP has gone further by asking people for character concepts which s/he will then stat up using Pathfinder point buy. To save you the trouble of reading the thread, see if you can spot the common thread: - 'a dashing handsome sort of hero who can woo the fair maiden, talk his way out of trouble, and tell when someone's pulling his leg?' CHA 7 - 'a rather strange lad?' CHA 7 - 'educated in history and archeology, and possibly arcana, but found that he enjoyed exploring musty tombs and using his practical skills over poring over dry books at the university' CHA 7 - 'terrorizes the land to drive people from sarenrae's worship' CHA 7 - 'He's gruff and taciturn for the most part' CHA 7 'But how can this be?' I hear you ask. Surely this campaign world is full of wart-ridden, social lepers who drool constantly and are as likely to punch you as say hello? Apparently not. It appears these people only comprise the ones for whom CHA doesn't give a mechanical benefit in their class. And better still, all they need to do to overcome their deeply, deeply unpleasant traits is... put ranks in Diplomacy, because with enough of them, you're just as good as someone with an 18 CHA! Now, to try and be fair, you could just as well say that the guy with DEX 7 can put lots of points into Stealth and be ninja-like, or someone with an INT 7 could be the world expert on botany because of all those ranks in Knowledge (Nature). Problem is, none of these optimisation threads would countenance a DEX 7 because it affects your initiative, and Ref save, and AC etc. So, if it doesn't mechanically affect anything other than CHA based spellcasters ability to cast more complicated spells, unlike all 5 other stats in the game, why is it still there? It's just a dump stat, and so the point buy idea becomes corrupted because it is no longer '15 pts' when anyone but the bard or sorcerer actually gets 19 pts - 15 plus the 4 extra they get for lowering their CHA to 7 - with absolutely no in game consequences. Is there a workable alternative to handle social interaction that would let us finally wave CHA goodbye? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
CHA, huh, what is it good for?
Top