Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
ShortQuests -- Pocket Sized Adventures! An all-new collection of digest-sized D&D adventures designed for 1-2 game sessions.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Chain Spell - consensus or official word?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Plane Sailing" data-source="post: 1724808" data-attributes="member: 114"><p>I think that the fact they didn't include chain spell as a metamagic feat in 3.5e suggests that they may have realised that it opened a can of worms that you don't necessarily want to walk through.</p><p></p><p>My contribution towards a consensus would be "ditch chain spell entirely, or at least rewrite it so that it (a) only works on area damaging spells and (b) has an effect exactly like that of chain lightning - so for +3 spell levels it will do full damage to the first target and then half damage to your level in secondary targets within specified range etc etc. That would probably work (although it would lose out on max damage cap of course, so it might only be worth a +2).</p><p></p><p>Then write a "mass spell" metamagic which allows a single target spell (probably a non damaging one) to effect your level in targets within a 20ft radius spread or whatever at xyz range. In 3.0e this worked out quite consistently at about +3 spell levels, they messed around with some new mass spells in 3.5e and positioned them a little strangely on the spell lists so it isn't so clear now.</p><p></p><p>So that's my opinion. Chain spell to reverse engineer the effects of chain lightning to it's damage spell brethren. New Mass spell to reverse engineer the effects of mass suggestion etc to their non damaging brethren.</p><p></p><p>Cheers</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Plane Sailing, post: 1724808, member: 114"] I think that the fact they didn't include chain spell as a metamagic feat in 3.5e suggests that they may have realised that it opened a can of worms that you don't necessarily want to walk through. My contribution towards a consensus would be "ditch chain spell entirely, or at least rewrite it so that it (a) only works on area damaging spells and (b) has an effect exactly like that of chain lightning - so for +3 spell levels it will do full damage to the first target and then half damage to your level in secondary targets within specified range etc etc. That would probably work (although it would lose out on max damage cap of course, so it might only be worth a +2). Then write a "mass spell" metamagic which allows a single target spell (probably a non damaging one) to effect your level in targets within a 20ft radius spread or whatever at xyz range. In 3.0e this worked out quite consistently at about +3 spell levels, they messed around with some new mass spells in 3.5e and positioned them a little strangely on the spell lists so it isn't so clear now. So that's my opinion. Chain spell to reverse engineer the effects of chain lightning to it's damage spell brethren. New Mass spell to reverse engineer the effects of mass suggestion etc to their non damaging brethren. Cheers [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Chain Spell - consensus or official word?
Top