Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
CHALLENGE: Change one thing about 5e
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="77IM" data-source="post: 6949642" data-attributes="member: 12377"><p>Be careful. Mr. Lowkey is a harsh taskmaster.</p><p></p><p>Still, if everybody else is doing it, I might as well...</p><p></p><p></p><p><strong>Problem:</strong></p><p>I've met too many players who were confused by the action system.</p><p></p><p>1. Bonus actions are confusing. It's hard to remember what's a bonus action, what's a free action, and what's a regular old action. Many players don't realize at first that you get only 1 bonus action per round (it's a "bonus," right? so it shouldn't be counted). There's some confusion about when the bonus action takes place: often you can do it before your main action, but sometimes it must come after. Technically, something you can do as a bonus action can NOT also be done as a regular action; except for many abilities that let you do a regular action as a bonus action.</p><p></p><p>2. Reactions are hard to track, especially in a large battle with lots of monsters. It's easier for players because they only have one character to track -- but PCs often have more reaction abilities, and in a big fight where there's a long stretch between turns, players sometimes take two reactions by accident (plus there's no incentive for them to be really careful about this). Furthermore some "passive" abilities look like reactions but aren't; for example, Evasion is something you have to remember when you get hit, but it doesn't use up your reaction (contrast a <em>ring of evasion</em> which does use up your reaction).</p><p></p><p>3. Extra Attack and two-weapon-fighting gum up the works even more. I've seen so many people try to use Extra Attack to take two arbitrary actions, like attack plus cast a spell. The conflict between the off-hand bonus attack and the rogue's Cunning Action bonus action is an interesting trade-off, but it doesn't come naturally to most players; I've seen multiple people get so used to taking the Cunning bonus action every single round, that they forget they can't do this when they make an off-hand attack. Heaven forbid anyone cast <em>haste</em> on that poor guy; there will probably be smoke coming out of his ears.</p><p></p><p>4. The Ready action is a very elegant piece of game design, how it turns an attack or spell into a reaction. But holy <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /><img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /><img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /><img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> is it way more complicated than it needs to be. Usually when I see a person Ready it's not because they have some clever master plan that involves precisely timed reaction to a pre-defined trigger; it's because they don't have anything useful to do right now, and they just want to wait without giving up their turn.</p><p></p><p></p><p>I want to be clear that <strong>I do not find these rules confusing, and you probably don't either</strong>. Us people who read forums like this and respond to topics like this are <em>good</em> with rules, good with turn sequences, good with tracking little bits of state like "took a reaction already this turn." But a LOT of the people who play D&D just want to sit down and have some fun bashing monsters. They want to announce their PC's action, and they don't want a whole ton of pushback in the form of "you can't do that this turn."</p><p></p><p></p><p><strong>Solution:</strong></p><p>I'm going to steal ideas from 4E and <em>Savage Worlds</em>, both of which I have played a lot, and <em>Shadow of the Demon Lord</em>, which I have never played but seems pretty sensible and was written by one of the designers of 5E.</p><p></p><p>1. Opportunity Attacks are no longer reactions. Take as many as you want. Who really cares. Are too many OAs really a bottleneck at most games? I didn't see this in 4E and I think the problem was overstated in 5E. Especially considering the new withdrawal rules that let you circle a creature without provoking, which means you no longer even need to restrict OAs to 1 per turn (it's pretty rare that a foe would leave your reach twice in the same turn so don't bother counting). I think making all the OAs is going to be faster and less cognitive load than keeping track of who has used up all their OAs.</p><p></p><p>2. For stuff that's really worth limiting, like many special powers, combine bonus action and reaction into a single "special action." You can take 1 per turn. It's special because they always come from special features, not the basic rules (remember OA no longer counts as a reaction, and I'll talk about TWF in a sec). And because the action itself says when you can take it, as opposed to the regular action, which you take on your turn. So now everybody gets 1 action on their turn, and 1 special action per turn. It's a lot less to track, and I'm guessing monsters with off-turn special actions should be pretty rare.</p><p></p><p>3. Make Extra Attack a special action. Yup, if you wanna attack twice on your turn, it uses up your special for the round. This provides a baseline for balancing other special actions. Fighter's extra Extra attacks would be a very special case of a special action that lets you attack more than once; by the time people reach level 11+, I think they can handle a rule of that complexity. Not sure how that interacts with Action Surge but we'll figure it out.</p><p></p><p>4. To compensate for the above point, all weapon attacks do +1[W] at 5th, 11th, and 17th level. This mirrors cantrip scaling, keeps OAs more relevant, and means your warrior-type can dish more and more damage without relying on too many special features; the special features become truly special.</p><p></p><p>5. Two-weapon fighting: Whenever you attack with your main hand, you can make a single attack with your off-hand. The off-hand damage doesn't get an ability bonus. If you're using your special action to Extra Attack, you wind up making an off-hand attack for each main-hand attack. This may be overpowered for someone with the Dual Wielder feat and weapons that do d8 damage (because of the [W] scaling), so we'll need to review the math on it.</p><p></p><p>6. Ready replaced with Delay: You don't take your turn now (no moving, no actions) although effects that trigger on the start/end of your turn happen now. Later, when you want to take your turn, you can. If two creatures are delaying and want to act at the same time, they solve this with a contest of Initiative. If the turn sequence gets back around to your regular turn and you're still delaying, then you basically lost a turn. I'd like to say that your place in the turn sequence changes when you take the delayed action, but, some groups may have trouble tracking this; observation would be required. (I generally see people use index-cards or something to track initiative, which would make changing your place easy, but for some groups it may be hard.)</p><p></p><p>7. Finally, if a PC wants to take multiple actions on their turn, or multiple special actions, let them. Each action is at a -5 to the attack roll, check or the saving throw DC, <em>per additional action</em>. An action that doesn't require an attack or check, or impose a save, now requires a DC 10 ability check (also at -5) using an ability score selected by the DM; on a failure, they can't take that action. This uses a -5 modifier instead of disadvantage so that it stacks (I don't want multiple actions to be easier when you are exhausted and blind). I don't expect novice/casual players to understand this rule. It's there for the when they say, "I want to run past all the goblins, stab the chief in the head, and then push him into the pit!" The DM can explain how they can do all that this round at a massive -10 penalty, or they can do less and have a better chance to succeed; maybe just run up this round and stab next round?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="77IM, post: 6949642, member: 12377"] Be careful. Mr. Lowkey is a harsh taskmaster. Still, if everybody else is doing it, I might as well... [B]Problem:[/B] I've met too many players who were confused by the action system. 1. Bonus actions are confusing. It's hard to remember what's a bonus action, what's a free action, and what's a regular old action. Many players don't realize at first that you get only 1 bonus action per round (it's a "bonus," right? so it shouldn't be counted). There's some confusion about when the bonus action takes place: often you can do it before your main action, but sometimes it must come after. Technically, something you can do as a bonus action can NOT also be done as a regular action; except for many abilities that let you do a regular action as a bonus action. 2. Reactions are hard to track, especially in a large battle with lots of monsters. It's easier for players because they only have one character to track -- but PCs often have more reaction abilities, and in a big fight where there's a long stretch between turns, players sometimes take two reactions by accident (plus there's no incentive for them to be really careful about this). Furthermore some "passive" abilities look like reactions but aren't; for example, Evasion is something you have to remember when you get hit, but it doesn't use up your reaction (contrast a [I]ring of evasion[/I] which does use up your reaction). 3. Extra Attack and two-weapon-fighting gum up the works even more. I've seen so many people try to use Extra Attack to take two arbitrary actions, like attack plus cast a spell. The conflict between the off-hand bonus attack and the rogue's Cunning Action bonus action is an interesting trade-off, but it doesn't come naturally to most players; I've seen multiple people get so used to taking the Cunning bonus action every single round, that they forget they can't do this when they make an off-hand attack. Heaven forbid anyone cast [I]haste[/I] on that poor guy; there will probably be smoke coming out of his ears. 4. The Ready action is a very elegant piece of game design, how it turns an attack or spell into a reaction. But holy :):):):) is it way more complicated than it needs to be. Usually when I see a person Ready it's not because they have some clever master plan that involves precisely timed reaction to a pre-defined trigger; it's because they don't have anything useful to do right now, and they just want to wait without giving up their turn. I want to be clear that [B]I do not find these rules confusing, and you probably don't either[/B]. Us people who read forums like this and respond to topics like this are [I]good[/I] with rules, good with turn sequences, good with tracking little bits of state like "took a reaction already this turn." But a LOT of the people who play D&D just want to sit down and have some fun bashing monsters. They want to announce their PC's action, and they don't want a whole ton of pushback in the form of "you can't do that this turn." [B]Solution:[/B] I'm going to steal ideas from 4E and [I]Savage Worlds[/I], both of which I have played a lot, and [I]Shadow of the Demon Lord[/I], which I have never played but seems pretty sensible and was written by one of the designers of 5E. 1. Opportunity Attacks are no longer reactions. Take as many as you want. Who really cares. Are too many OAs really a bottleneck at most games? I didn't see this in 4E and I think the problem was overstated in 5E. Especially considering the new withdrawal rules that let you circle a creature without provoking, which means you no longer even need to restrict OAs to 1 per turn (it's pretty rare that a foe would leave your reach twice in the same turn so don't bother counting). I think making all the OAs is going to be faster and less cognitive load than keeping track of who has used up all their OAs. 2. For stuff that's really worth limiting, like many special powers, combine bonus action and reaction into a single "special action." You can take 1 per turn. It's special because they always come from special features, not the basic rules (remember OA no longer counts as a reaction, and I'll talk about TWF in a sec). And because the action itself says when you can take it, as opposed to the regular action, which you take on your turn. So now everybody gets 1 action on their turn, and 1 special action per turn. It's a lot less to track, and I'm guessing monsters with off-turn special actions should be pretty rare. 3. Make Extra Attack a special action. Yup, if you wanna attack twice on your turn, it uses up your special for the round. This provides a baseline for balancing other special actions. Fighter's extra Extra attacks would be a very special case of a special action that lets you attack more than once; by the time people reach level 11+, I think they can handle a rule of that complexity. Not sure how that interacts with Action Surge but we'll figure it out. 4. To compensate for the above point, all weapon attacks do +1[W] at 5th, 11th, and 17th level. This mirrors cantrip scaling, keeps OAs more relevant, and means your warrior-type can dish more and more damage without relying on too many special features; the special features become truly special. 5. Two-weapon fighting: Whenever you attack with your main hand, you can make a single attack with your off-hand. The off-hand damage doesn't get an ability bonus. If you're using your special action to Extra Attack, you wind up making an off-hand attack for each main-hand attack. This may be overpowered for someone with the Dual Wielder feat and weapons that do d8 damage (because of the [W] scaling), so we'll need to review the math on it. 6. Ready replaced with Delay: You don't take your turn now (no moving, no actions) although effects that trigger on the start/end of your turn happen now. Later, when you want to take your turn, you can. If two creatures are delaying and want to act at the same time, they solve this with a contest of Initiative. If the turn sequence gets back around to your regular turn and you're still delaying, then you basically lost a turn. I'd like to say that your place in the turn sequence changes when you take the delayed action, but, some groups may have trouble tracking this; observation would be required. (I generally see people use index-cards or something to track initiative, which would make changing your place easy, but for some groups it may be hard.) 7. Finally, if a PC wants to take multiple actions on their turn, or multiple special actions, let them. Each action is at a -5 to the attack roll, check or the saving throw DC, [I]per additional action[/I]. An action that doesn't require an attack or check, or impose a save, now requires a DC 10 ability check (also at -5) using an ability score selected by the DM; on a failure, they can't take that action. This uses a -5 modifier instead of disadvantage so that it stacks (I don't want multiple actions to be easier when you are exhausted and blind). I don't expect novice/casual players to understand this rule. It's there for the when they say, "I want to run past all the goblins, stab the chief in the head, and then push him into the pit!" The DM can explain how they can do all that this round at a massive -10 penalty, or they can do less and have a better chance to succeed; maybe just run up this round and stab next round? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
CHALLENGE: Change one thing about 5e
Top