Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Challenge: Invent a PHB Class List with 6 Classes
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="EzekielRaiden" data-source="post: 8610745" data-attributes="member: 6790260"><p>Well, I am opposed to class reductionism <em>solely for its own sake</em>, so before I give any other answers, I wish to register my grievances with the fundamental concept. "Less is more" is only valid when <em>you actually DO MORE with less</em>.</p><p></p><p>But, because I don't just want to threadcrap and <em>have</em> actually been thinking on it, sure, let's do this thing--and because I can use a thing I've thought on before.</p><p></p><p>See, I like the idea of the MTG color wheel. It's interesting, and can be exploited for both thematic and mechanical structure. I'm a sucker for places where rich thematic structure is, at the very same time, rigorous mechanical structure. And it turns out, we have a rather handy tool for differentiating stuff; 4e called it "power source."</p><p></p><p>My "six" (really, "five plus one") options would thus be</p><p>Martial</p><p>Divine</p><p>Primal</p><p>Arcane</p><p>Shadow</p><p>+</p><p>Psionic</p><p></p><p>Or, if you prefer "class"-style names rather than "source"-style names (not my preference, but there's no real difference in this context), that would be Warrior, Cleric, Shaman, Mage, Shadow,* and Mystic. Each of these then can specialize in offense, defense, control, or support; so a support-focused Cleric is a Priest, a support-focused Mage is a Bard, a support-focused Warrior is a Warlord (or whatever term you prefer). The Psionic source/Mystic class stands out from the others because it has no specialization--its special feature is that it picks and chooses from the whole scope of Psionic options, in a "the Green Lantern Ring is the most powerful weapon in the universe" kind of way. This would be balanced by (a) giving the Mystic very minimal baseline class features, so they <em>have</em> to leverage the synergy of their abilities to "keep up with the Joneses," and (b) including some kind of resource mechanic and/or reduced <em>amount</em> of abilities, to ensure that the greater freedom does not directly translate to immediately greater power.</p><p></p><p>The aforementioned specializations are something you choose early on, giving you a clear and defined facility with that aspect of play. All characters have the <em>potential</em> to grow into/"officially" acquire other specialties, or blend the benefits of two specialties in a way that supports both. All sources/classes except Psionic have an innate lean toward one of the specialties, and some options may require that you have a certain specialty in order to use them (or may get stronger because you have that specialty). E.g., a "Paladin" is a defense-specialized Divine character, with a variable side of healing mojo; by investing further into other support-related things, said Paladin may also pick up a minor or reduced form of support specialization, which when coupled with the innate support leaning of Divine characters, may allow him to be both an excellent protector of his team <em>and</em> an excellent provider of healing, restoration, and force-multiplication.</p><p></p><p>Loosely, each of the six associates with certain ability scores. Martial with Strength (or Dex), Divine with Wisdom (or Cha), Primal with Con (or Str), Arcane with Int (or Cha), Shadow with Dex (or Int), Psionic with Cha (or Wis). Doesn't mean other ability scores couldn't be relevant, just that those are <em>loosely</em> understood to be useful to most characters of the given source/class. E.g. a "Paladin" (defense-specialty Divine character) values Charisma, but also values Strength and Constitution because those are useful for wearing heavy armor, using heavy weapons, and taking hits. A "Ninja" (defense-specialty Shadow character) values Dexterity, but also values Wisdom and Constitution, because their fighting style is about observation, pinpoint strikes, and never getting hit in the first place (but being able to take it when a hit does land).</p><p></p><p>*Normally I'd prefer something else, but this power source is rather diverse, combining "dark wizard" types, ninjas, assassins, demonologists, necromancers, and alchemists under one roof. And most synonyms are either excessively bland, obscure (like "Larrikin"), or overly-specific (like "Spy" or "Ruffian").</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="EzekielRaiden, post: 8610745, member: 6790260"] Well, I am opposed to class reductionism [I]solely for its own sake[/I], so before I give any other answers, I wish to register my grievances with the fundamental concept. "Less is more" is only valid when [I]you actually DO MORE with less[/I]. But, because I don't just want to threadcrap and [I]have[/I] actually been thinking on it, sure, let's do this thing--and because I can use a thing I've thought on before. See, I like the idea of the MTG color wheel. It's interesting, and can be exploited for both thematic and mechanical structure. I'm a sucker for places where rich thematic structure is, at the very same time, rigorous mechanical structure. And it turns out, we have a rather handy tool for differentiating stuff; 4e called it "power source." My "six" (really, "five plus one") options would thus be Martial Divine Primal Arcane Shadow + Psionic Or, if you prefer "class"-style names rather than "source"-style names (not my preference, but there's no real difference in this context), that would be Warrior, Cleric, Shaman, Mage, Shadow,* and Mystic. Each of these then can specialize in offense, defense, control, or support; so a support-focused Cleric is a Priest, a support-focused Mage is a Bard, a support-focused Warrior is a Warlord (or whatever term you prefer). The Psionic source/Mystic class stands out from the others because it has no specialization--its special feature is that it picks and chooses from the whole scope of Psionic options, in a "the Green Lantern Ring is the most powerful weapon in the universe" kind of way. This would be balanced by (a) giving the Mystic very minimal baseline class features, so they [I]have[/I] to leverage the synergy of their abilities to "keep up with the Joneses," and (b) including some kind of resource mechanic and/or reduced [I]amount[/I] of abilities, to ensure that the greater freedom does not directly translate to immediately greater power. The aforementioned specializations are something you choose early on, giving you a clear and defined facility with that aspect of play. All characters have the [I]potential[/I] to grow into/"officially" acquire other specialties, or blend the benefits of two specialties in a way that supports both. All sources/classes except Psionic have an innate lean toward one of the specialties, and some options may require that you have a certain specialty in order to use them (or may get stronger because you have that specialty). E.g., a "Paladin" is a defense-specialized Divine character, with a variable side of healing mojo; by investing further into other support-related things, said Paladin may also pick up a minor or reduced form of support specialization, which when coupled with the innate support leaning of Divine characters, may allow him to be both an excellent protector of his team [I]and[/I] an excellent provider of healing, restoration, and force-multiplication. Loosely, each of the six associates with certain ability scores. Martial with Strength (or Dex), Divine with Wisdom (or Cha), Primal with Con (or Str), Arcane with Int (or Cha), Shadow with Dex (or Int), Psionic with Cha (or Wis). Doesn't mean other ability scores couldn't be relevant, just that those are [I]loosely[/I] understood to be useful to most characters of the given source/class. E.g. a "Paladin" (defense-specialty Divine character) values Charisma, but also values Strength and Constitution because those are useful for wearing heavy armor, using heavy weapons, and taking hits. A "Ninja" (defense-specialty Shadow character) values Dexterity, but also values Wisdom and Constitution, because their fighting style is about observation, pinpoint strikes, and never getting hit in the first place (but being able to take it when a hit does land). *Normally I'd prefer something else, but this power source is rather diverse, combining "dark wizard" types, ninjas, assassins, demonologists, necromancers, and alchemists under one roof. And most synonyms are either excessively bland, obscure (like "Larrikin"), or overly-specific (like "Spy" or "Ruffian"). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Challenge: Invent a PHB Class List with 6 Classes
Top