Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="squibbles" data-source="post: 8612018" data-attributes="member: 6937590">Curious. I have never played Elder Scrolls Online or even really read anything about it, but that's more or less the list I came up with:Warrior = martial heavy Rogue = martial light Wizard = arcane/high magic Thaumaturge = holy/divine Enchanter ~= nature/fey/green Diabolist = shadow/necromancy/darkInteresting choice to put Druids and Warlocks together and to flag the forces they worship/serve as "not divine." A lot of the solutions to this challenge have novel impacts on D&D's implied setting, and this is one of the cooler ones. I like it a lot better than the FR convention that Druids serve nature gods but... somehow differently than Clerics. I wonder where this idea might lead. Makes me think of the Elric series' <a href="https://en.everybodywiki.com/Deities_in_the_Elric_series#The_Beast-Lords" target="_blank">Beastlords</a>, though that's not really what it implies.Too true, just as restrictions enhance rather than detract from creativity. That's the purpose of this challenge tbh. Adding or subtracting one or two classes is an obvious change, dropping down to the core 4 or fighter/wizard/rogue is an obvious change, going classless is an obvious change, but a good list of six classes isn't at all obvious--a lot has to be finessed or contrived to keep all the concepts in the current list but put them in six classes.The wisdom of crowds solution eh... and it actually gives us a pretty cool list.How would the remaining classes go into those? Maybe:Fighter (+Monk, +Paladin, +Ranger) Rogue (+Bard, +Monk?) Warlock (+Sorcerer, +Bard?) Wizard (+Artificer?) Cleric (+Druid) Barbarian (+Ranger?)</blockquote>

Verification