Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Challenge to WotC: Initiative
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ThirdWizard" data-source="post: 3890087" data-attributes="member: 12037"><p>I think it is a smart thing. I think that releasing much of any hard information on 4e prior to Christmas would be a bad move, because they're still trying to move 3.5 edition product. The more people on the fence this year, the better for them! They can try and pull those people over after the holiday sales have ended. I imagine that this is the reason we haven't seen much in the way of hard mechanics so far in any of the articles or blogs, because their Marketing department (or maybe PR or both) are deciding what can and what cannot be talked about.</p><p></p><p>Think about it. Right now, their marketers like you more than me. I'm not buying any more 3.5 because I'm so optimistic that 4e will be better that I won't spend the money. But, since you're undecided, wanting to weigh the facts of the new system against your preferences, you might actually buy or get some 3.5 stuff between now and June. The more they make you want 4e, the <em>less</em> money they make for the next six months! They can wait to sell it to you.</p><p></p><p>Also, replying to questions posted is one thing. Replying to "challenges" to answer questions is probably a different matter. There's a difference between "Hey, I'm curious about X" and "I challenge you to tell us about X." Especially when there are timetables on things it starts to look like a demand. One is far more confrontational, and the more confrontational the message, the less likely to get a response (thus my "dare" post - I was unusually busy today at work or it would have been more in depth).</p><p></p><p>It's not about good and bad. I really don't care if they don't want to release any information at all, besides my own burgeoning curiosity. It's about business decisions and staying on whatever marketing path they've decided is best. I choose not to interpret their silence as a bad sign until May of next year. Others are free to interpret as they wish, and that's fine.</p><p></p><p>Maybe they will explain it. Maybe I'm totally wrong. And, if I am, feel free to point it out to me, I really won't mind! I'm wrong a lot. But, as Darkwolf71 said in the first response, I wouldn't hold my breath.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ThirdWizard, post: 3890087, member: 12037"] I think it is a smart thing. I think that releasing much of any hard information on 4e prior to Christmas would be a bad move, because they're still trying to move 3.5 edition product. The more people on the fence this year, the better for them! They can try and pull those people over after the holiday sales have ended. I imagine that this is the reason we haven't seen much in the way of hard mechanics so far in any of the articles or blogs, because their Marketing department (or maybe PR or both) are deciding what can and what cannot be talked about. Think about it. Right now, their marketers like you more than me. I'm not buying any more 3.5 because I'm so optimistic that 4e will be better that I won't spend the money. But, since you're undecided, wanting to weigh the facts of the new system against your preferences, you might actually buy or get some 3.5 stuff between now and June. The more they make you want 4e, the [i]less[/i] money they make for the next six months! They can wait to sell it to you. Also, replying to questions posted is one thing. Replying to "challenges" to answer questions is probably a different matter. There's a difference between "Hey, I'm curious about X" and "I challenge you to tell us about X." Especially when there are timetables on things it starts to look like a demand. One is far more confrontational, and the more confrontational the message, the less likely to get a response (thus my "dare" post - I was unusually busy today at work or it would have been more in depth). It's not about good and bad. I really don't care if they don't want to release any information at all, besides my own burgeoning curiosity. It's about business decisions and staying on whatever marketing path they've decided is best. I choose not to interpret their silence as a bad sign until May of next year. Others are free to interpret as they wish, and that's fine. Maybe they will explain it. Maybe I'm totally wrong. And, if I am, feel free to point it out to me, I really won't mind! I'm wrong a lot. But, as Darkwolf71 said in the first response, I wouldn't hold my breath. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Challenge to WotC: Initiative
Top