Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Challenge to WotC: Initiative
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Raven Crowking" data-source="post: 3891070" data-attributes="member: 18280"><p>Sorry, but I am afraid that accepting that is just giving in to the poisonous relationship that some folks insist upon cultivating. You know, the one that includes ridiculing anyone who voices a legitimate concern. Unwillingness to explore those concerns like adults is, IMHO, the #1 contributor to the poisonous atmosphere you are describing.</p><p></p><p>It was not something that happened with 3e. Again, by this point, WotC had a clear message and was giving out clear information. I have recently gone through the Dragons leading up to 3e, and I am amazed at the difference....it was far more than I was expecting.</p><p></p><p>There are some things I really like about the 4e design direction (insofar as it has been revealled), some things that make me wonder whether or not the designers took enough into consideration when attempting to fix problems, some things that remind me of my own house rules (an easily accessed Faerie, fighting styles based on weapons, etc.), and some things that I just don't like (tieflings and warforged as core). </p><p></p><p>I will readily admit that I am really not happy with the DI.</p><p></p><p>I will certainly agree that some fans can contribute to "the poisonous wotc/fan relationship", but telling us "We're bending over backwards to tell you everything we can" while telling us nothing of substance, to my mind, is certainly cultivating poison. Actually being responsive, and supplying some real answers, would do a hell of a lot, IMHO, toward removing the poisonous atmosphere.</p><p></p><p>IMHO. YOMV, and obviously does.</p><p></p><p>RC</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Raven Crowking, post: 3891070, member: 18280"] Sorry, but I am afraid that accepting that is just giving in to the poisonous relationship that some folks insist upon cultivating. You know, the one that includes ridiculing anyone who voices a legitimate concern. Unwillingness to explore those concerns like adults is, IMHO, the #1 contributor to the poisonous atmosphere you are describing. It was not something that happened with 3e. Again, by this point, WotC had a clear message and was giving out clear information. I have recently gone through the Dragons leading up to 3e, and I am amazed at the difference....it was far more than I was expecting. There are some things I really like about the 4e design direction (insofar as it has been revealled), some things that make me wonder whether or not the designers took enough into consideration when attempting to fix problems, some things that remind me of my own house rules (an easily accessed Faerie, fighting styles based on weapons, etc.), and some things that I just don't like (tieflings and warforged as core). I will readily admit that I am really not happy with the DI. I will certainly agree that some fans can contribute to "the poisonous wotc/fan relationship", but telling us "We're bending over backwards to tell you everything we can" while telling us nothing of substance, to my mind, is certainly cultivating poison. Actually being responsive, and supplying some real answers, would do a hell of a lot, IMHO, toward removing the poisonous atmosphere. IMHO. YOMV, and obviously does. RC [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Challenge to WotC: Initiative
Top