Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Upper_Krust" data-source="post: 4269248" data-attributes="member: 326">Okay last post for today (or else I'll be late)...off for a week and a half as of tomorrow - will catch up with everything then.Hey Kerrick matey! <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />I didn't miss the point of a 3.75. What I am saying, is that you cannot undo the numerous flaws of 3/3.5 without rewriting the rulebooks almost entirely which defeats the purpose of a 3.75. For instance how can they 'edit' existing Monster Manuals without a new Monster Manual - the simple fact is that they can't....and better than 3.5 is no longer good enough. They need to make it better than 4E thats the new benchmark as far as I can see, and theres no way they can do that and retain any links to 3.5.We'll see. Then again he's already made his millions he may not bother either way.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Upper_Krust, post: 4269248, member: 326"] Okay last post for today (or else I'll be late)...off for a week and a half as of tomorrow - will catch up with everything then. Hey Kerrick matey! :) I didn't miss the point of a 3.75. What I am saying, is that you cannot undo the numerous flaws of 3/3.5 without rewriting the rulebooks almost entirely which defeats the purpose of a 3.75. For instance how can they 'edit' existing Monster Manuals without a new Monster Manual - the simple fact is that they can't. ...and better than 3.5 is no longer good enough. They need to make it better than 4E thats the new benchmark as far as I can see, and theres no way they can do that and retain any links to 3.5. We'll see. Then again he's already made his millions he may not bother either way. [/QUOTE]

Verification