Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
Archive Forums
Hosted Forums
Personal & Hosted Forums
Hosted Publisher Forums
Eternity Publishing Hosted Forum
Challenging Challenge Ratings...again
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ltheb Silverfrond" data-source="post: 4271690" data-attributes="member: 39867"><p>I must say, I am impressed by many of the things 4E has done. It scales pretty darn well, and its fun to play. I playtested some stuff the other night. First time I ever had fun playtesting anything. (Usually its just hell to remember 50 billion things)</p><p></p><p>3E did many things right. </p><p>It streamlined the game compared to previous editions. (no more consulting 100 gazillion tables, or backwards AC progressions, or D% rolls) </p><p>It presented an easily adaptable system that could, with a bit of elbow grease, apply to anything. (Sci-fi, Fantasy, Modern, Horror, Etc) </p><p>It also was, and still is, one of the few game systems where the monsters and PCs play by the same rules. (usually)</p><p>Strategy levels were also quite high as preparing for a battle before hand was more important then the tactics that went into it. (Since in 3E Fighter tactics = Charge in, then full attack until it dies)</p><p></p><p>4E seems like a nice extension of 3E. </p><p>It further streamlines the game. </p><p>(Everything being presented in the same format makes things really easy to run or design; Non-combat things, like professions and the like are left to GMs because no rule will ever cover every situation) </p><p>It is adaptable. (you can easily have psionics, or Wuxia, or even modern) </p><p>And while monsters and PCs play by the same rules, they are not built by them, so If theres a kind of monster or encounter you want to model, you are not restricted to plugging tables and getting a result you didn't intend. (Like a Marilith being forced to use large-sized weapons due to it's size, when its arms should only medium...)</p><p>Tactics are in a much higher quantity then strategy, since the game is most action packed during combat, why not make them more exciting and meaningful?</p><p></p><p>Whatever the reason, whether we like or dislike 3E or 4E and how much, is a choice each of us must make. I personally think its too early to judge, but I like what I see as far as 4E goes. It takes everything I like about 3E, and over all makes it more fun. I can still run my same old low-magic, high-adventure/intrigue setting in 4E, with next to no Retcon. But with 4E, its more fun to play. (For me at least, your results may vary.)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ltheb Silverfrond, post: 4271690, member: 39867"] I must say, I am impressed by many of the things 4E has done. It scales pretty darn well, and its fun to play. I playtested some stuff the other night. First time I ever had fun playtesting anything. (Usually its just hell to remember 50 billion things) 3E did many things right. It streamlined the game compared to previous editions. (no more consulting 100 gazillion tables, or backwards AC progressions, or D% rolls) It presented an easily adaptable system that could, with a bit of elbow grease, apply to anything. (Sci-fi, Fantasy, Modern, Horror, Etc) It also was, and still is, one of the few game systems where the monsters and PCs play by the same rules. (usually) Strategy levels were also quite high as preparing for a battle before hand was more important then the tactics that went into it. (Since in 3E Fighter tactics = Charge in, then full attack until it dies) 4E seems like a nice extension of 3E. It further streamlines the game. (Everything being presented in the same format makes things really easy to run or design; Non-combat things, like professions and the like are left to GMs because no rule will ever cover every situation) It is adaptable. (you can easily have psionics, or Wuxia, or even modern) And while monsters and PCs play by the same rules, they are not built by them, so If theres a kind of monster or encounter you want to model, you are not restricted to plugging tables and getting a result you didn't intend. (Like a Marilith being forced to use large-sized weapons due to it's size, when its arms should only medium...) Tactics are in a much higher quantity then strategy, since the game is most action packed during combat, why not make them more exciting and meaningful? Whatever the reason, whether we like or dislike 3E or 4E and how much, is a choice each of us must make. I personally think its too early to judge, but I like what I see as far as 4E goes. It takes everything I like about 3E, and over all makes it more fun. I can still run my same old low-magic, high-adventure/intrigue setting in 4E, with next to no Retcon. But with 4E, its more fun to play. (For me at least, your results may vary.) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
Archive Forums
Hosted Forums
Personal & Hosted Forums
Hosted Publisher Forums
Eternity Publishing Hosted Forum
Challenging Challenge Ratings...again
Top