Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Kerrick" data-source="post: 4720412" data-attributes="member: 4722">It's from the ELH. You talked about the Perfect MWF feat <a href="http://www.immortalshandbook.com/freestuff11.htm" target="_blank">here</a> and said that it was broken because it treats all the hands as offhands. Your example used a marilith; with six arms and four feats (MWF, Greater MWF, Improved MWF, and Perfect MWF), she'd have 24 attacks/round. Your suggestion was &quot;Every additional arm/limb should require one feat for every additional iterative attack.&quot;Assuming I'm doing the math right, the marilith would have +23 with the primary weapon (25 - 2) and 19 (25 - 6) with all the offhand ones. IMWF and up grant a second attack with the offhands at an additional -5... and I just realized where I screwed up. It should be Primary +23/+18/+13/+8 and Secondary +19/+14 and 4 longswords +19. Never mind - it's been a long week, and I've been sick with some kind of throat infection, which I'm finally getting over.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Kerrick, post: 4720412, member: 4722"] It's from the ELH. You talked about the Perfect MWF feat [url=http://www.immortalshandbook.com/freestuff11.htm]here[/url] and said that it was broken because it treats all the hands as offhands. Your example used a marilith; with six arms and four feats (MWF, Greater MWF, Improved MWF, and Perfect MWF), she'd have 24 attacks/round. Your suggestion was "Every additional arm/limb should require one feat for every additional iterative attack." Assuming I'm doing the math right, the marilith would have +23 with the primary weapon (25 - 2) and 19 (25 - 6) with all the offhand ones. IMWF and up grant a second attack with the offhands at an additional -5... and I just realized where I screwed up. It should be Primary +23/+18/+13/+8 and Secondary +19/+14 and 4 longswords +19. Never mind - it's been a long week, and I've been sick with some kind of throat infection, which I'm finally getting over. [/QUOTE]

Verification