Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="The Crimson Binome" data-source="post: 6609022" data-attributes="member: 6775031">My interaction is with my greatsword. The thing I am doing with my greatsword is trading it out for two short swords. It's one interaction. It's slightly more complex than just drawing or sheathing a weapon, but even the list of examples includes actions of different complexity.It might be a bit of a stretch, but it's all semantics at that point. I could see people ruling against this, if they specifically choose to take the narrow interpretation you suggest. I would also expect a lot of reasonable DMs to take my side in this. There is room for interpretation.Remember, the rules of the game reflect the reality of the game world; they don't define it. If it doesn't make sense to you that drawing two short swords is the same interaction-level as drawing one short sword, then you need to make your case for what sort of reality you are seeing that would lead to the game rule interpretation you're trying to promote.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="The Crimson Binome, post: 6609022, member: 6775031"] My interaction is with my greatsword. The thing I am doing with my greatsword is [I]trading it out for two short swords[/I]. It's one interaction. It's slightly more complex than [I]just[/I] drawing or sheathing a weapon, but even the list of examples includes actions of different complexity. It might be a bit of a stretch, but it's all semantics at that point. I could see people ruling against this, if they specifically choose to take the narrow interpretation you suggest. I would also expect a lot of reasonable DMs to take my side in this. There is room for interpretation. Remember, the rules of the game [I]reflect[/I] the reality of the game world; they don't [I]define[/I] it. If it doesn't make sense to you that drawing two short swords is the same interaction-level as drawing one short sword, then you need to make your case for what sort of reality you are seeing that would lead to the game rule interpretation you're trying to promote. [/QUOTE]

Verification