Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Chance of PC Failure
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Li Shenron" data-source="post: 5804225" data-attributes="member: 1465"><p>The problem I have with this, is that nowadays it is not so common.</p><p></p><p>According to what I read in this and other forums/websites, the average D&D player today typically wants:</p><p></p><p>- To create a character more powerful that normal, where normal means according to the core rules (which supposedly are already designed to represent some talented soon-to-be heroes); there is almost no gaming group which deliberately house-rules character creation downwards, while on the other hand almost every house-rule for character generation goes towards giving more, sometimes openly with the target of a "high-power campaign". Some groups do play "low-power campaign", but always by making magic items scarce and almost never by giving less personal numbers/powers to the PC.</p><p></p><p>- To start playing at a higher level than 1, except at the beginning of a new edition. Soon after an adventure or two, almost everybody is bored by 1st level and wants to start higher.</p><p></p><p>- To create more powerful combos, as soon as splatbooks become available.</p><p></p><p>- To play characters that have no real flaws. One or two moderately low scores are ok, but God forbids if the PC has a weak spot or significantly low defense. They want to be well protected from everything. They will minimize something (dump stat) only if they can use some combo that effectively makes the dump stat replaced by something else thus irrelevant.</p><p></p><p>- To level up quickly, because otherwise they think it's boring.</p><p></p><p>- To skip over the story quickly, get into combat, then another combat, then another combat, all in a row without such thing as resting getting in the way.</p><p></p><p>- To see "defeating the opponents" as the only conceivable way to win an encounter, therefore banging their heads against any enemy presuming it is always doable, and then complaining to the DM if they didn't succeed.</p><p></p><p>- To have stats for Gods in the books, or something akin (guess why).</p><p></p><p>- To die rarely, but repeatedly.</p><p></p><p>I can't help but think that many of the average gamers come from the world of computer games, and I wonder how many of them have a culture of playing with cheats and hacks and codes... it's a very different idea of fun from mine, since I'm practically the opposite of all the points I've listed, but what can I say, they're entitled to their own fun too.</p><p></p><p>Maybe I just treat the game too seriously... but I've learned from life that if something is either trivial (no chance of failure) or impossible (no chance of success), you get no reward from it. So in my own view a PC must have a chance of dying... </p><p></p><p>Of course if it's too frequent then it becomes frustrating, but for me frustration appears only if:</p><p>- character creation is cumbersome and takes too much time</p><p>- changing the party composition too frequently kinda "breaks" the story consequentiality</p><p></p><p>Otherwise, death of a PC is the perfect chance at trying another character type.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Li Shenron, post: 5804225, member: 1465"] The problem I have with this, is that nowadays it is not so common. According to what I read in this and other forums/websites, the average D&D player today typically wants: - To create a character more powerful that normal, where normal means according to the core rules (which supposedly are already designed to represent some talented soon-to-be heroes); there is almost no gaming group which deliberately house-rules character creation downwards, while on the other hand almost every house-rule for character generation goes towards giving more, sometimes openly with the target of a "high-power campaign". Some groups do play "low-power campaign", but always by making magic items scarce and almost never by giving less personal numbers/powers to the PC. - To start playing at a higher level than 1, except at the beginning of a new edition. Soon after an adventure or two, almost everybody is bored by 1st level and wants to start higher. - To create more powerful combos, as soon as splatbooks become available. - To play characters that have no real flaws. One or two moderately low scores are ok, but God forbids if the PC has a weak spot or significantly low defense. They want to be well protected from everything. They will minimize something (dump stat) only if they can use some combo that effectively makes the dump stat replaced by something else thus irrelevant. - To level up quickly, because otherwise they think it's boring. - To skip over the story quickly, get into combat, then another combat, then another combat, all in a row without such thing as resting getting in the way. - To see "defeating the opponents" as the only conceivable way to win an encounter, therefore banging their heads against any enemy presuming it is always doable, and then complaining to the DM if they didn't succeed. - To have stats for Gods in the books, or something akin (guess why). - To die rarely, but repeatedly. I can't help but think that many of the average gamers come from the world of computer games, and I wonder how many of them have a culture of playing with cheats and hacks and codes... it's a very different idea of fun from mine, since I'm practically the opposite of all the points I've listed, but what can I say, they're entitled to their own fun too. Maybe I just treat the game too seriously... but I've learned from life that if something is either trivial (no chance of failure) or impossible (no chance of success), you get no reward from it. So in my own view a PC must have a chance of dying... Of course if it's too frequent then it becomes frustrating, but for me frustration appears only if: - character creation is cumbersome and takes too much time - changing the party composition too frequently kinda "breaks" the story consequentiality Otherwise, death of a PC is the perfect chance at trying another character type. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Chance of PC Failure
Top