Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Cadence" data-source="post: 8927958" data-attributes="member: 6701124">Are there any people IRL who would always have been judged attractive in every culture on earth over the past 200 years?Would it be easier or harder to imagine happening in a world with many different species?If there were some &quot;universal measure of physical beauty&quot; as some have suggested might develop, is there any reason to expect it would at all be related to what we currently use to define attractiveness?&nbsp; Does human based attractiveness being part of cross-species attractiveness (from Thri-Kreen to Warforged) work better if types/races/species are essentially masks?Given the number of disparate things it's tied to (Intimidation, Persuasion, etc ..) does it almost work better as an unexplainable thing akin to VtM's Presence discipline?&nbsp; Would that explain both the hag and the nymph and working across species?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Cadence, post: 8927958, member: 6701124"] Are there any people IRL who would always have been judged attractive in every culture on earth over the past 200 years? Would it be easier or harder to imagine happening in a world with many different species? If there were some "universal measure of physical beauty" as some have suggested might develop, is there any reason to expect it would at all be related to what we currently use to define attractiveness? Does human based attractiveness being part of cross-species attractiveness (from Thri-Kreen to Warforged) work better if types/races/species are essentially masks? Given the number of disparate things it's tied to (Intimidation, Persuasion, etc ..) does it almost work better as an unexplainable thing akin to VtM's Presence discipline? Would that explain both the hag and the nymph and working across species? [/QUOTE]

Verification