Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Change in Charisma Description
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Clint_L" data-source="post: 8928265" data-attributes="member: 7035894"><p>What makes it logically wrong is that charisma has an objective value in D&D. It is quantifiable. Beauty, as we have pretty clearly established, is subjective. So making beauty the basis of your charisma becomes nonsensical, unless we want to work out the character's charisma relative to each and every encounter. Because I am pretty sure that your flowing blonde locks and voluptuous curves, or whatever, aren't going to impress that intelligent ooze you are trying to persuade, so if that's all you've got going for you, then sorry but your charisma is a "3" for this roll.</p><p></p><p>Not to mention the weird, weird idea that a warlock is good at magic because he is totally ripped, or something. I think this player has not thought through the implications of their concept of charisma.</p><p></p><p>And that's setting aside what makes it morally wrong: that telling players that they can have "high charisma <em>because they are beautiful" </em>is a terrible, terrible message. In the real world, kids getting fixated on the message that what matters most is how they look causes horrible psychological damage. Every high school, every year, deals with numerous kids who are doing serious damage to themselves because they get this message all too often and believe it all too much. Does it need to get it's grubby little fingers into their escapist fantasy worlds, even a little bit? Do we really need even the suggestion of it in the rules of the game?</p><p></p><p><em>Why?</em></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Clint_L, post: 8928265, member: 7035894"] What makes it logically wrong is that charisma has an objective value in D&D. It is quantifiable. Beauty, as we have pretty clearly established, is subjective. So making beauty the basis of your charisma becomes nonsensical, unless we want to work out the character's charisma relative to each and every encounter. Because I am pretty sure that your flowing blonde locks and voluptuous curves, or whatever, aren't going to impress that intelligent ooze you are trying to persuade, so if that's all you've got going for you, then sorry but your charisma is a "3" for this roll. Not to mention the weird, weird idea that a warlock is good at magic because he is totally ripped, or something. I think this player has not thought through the implications of their concept of charisma. And that's setting aside what makes it morally wrong: that telling players that they can have "high charisma [I]because they are beautiful" [/I]is a terrible, terrible message. In the real world, kids getting fixated on the message that what matters most is how they look causes horrible psychological damage. Every high school, every year, deals with numerous kids who are doing serious damage to themselves because they get this message all too often and believe it all too much. Does it need to get it's grubby little fingers into their escapist fantasy worlds, even a little bit? Do we really need even the suggestion of it in the rules of the game? [I]Why?[/I] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Change in Charisma Description
Top