Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Changeling (from the UA article): crazy broken?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="steeldragons" data-source="post: 6518592" data-attributes="member: 92511"><p>Well. For one, as DM I would not permit a thri-kreen...assuming the changling had seen one in the first place. It is not a "humanoid." It is an insect. Yes, I know the term 'humanoid" is a creature type and the thri-kreen are, in fact, listed in the MM as "<em>humanoid (thri-kreen)</em>", but I would say/rule the creature's additional limbs is a step too far to their abilities as, obviously, intended.</p><p></p><p>Aarakocra, I would think the more likely issue is the Changeling will not have seen one. And, similarly, is not a humanoid. Aarakocra in 5e have separate wings. Their arms are not wings, as in former editions. So, the Changeling could not, actually, make themselves an aarakocra since (as with the thri-kreen) they can not give themselves additional limbs.</p><p></p><p>The Merfolk, I have no issue with them doing that to be able to move/survive in an aquatic environment. Seems a perfectly reasonable and expected use of the power. However, again, the question then becomes, "When/where did your character see a merman [aquatic elf, locatha, etc...] to emulate?"</p><p></p><p>The answer to any of those "you have seen" questions, for a game I were DMing would be "if it's not a common humanoid type [as one would see walking around town]" that if it hasn't happened "in play", then it hasn't happened.</p><p></p><p>I don't think "saw it in a book" is sufficient for this ability, as written or intended, hence the "have seen" stipulation. So, for a "typical/standard" [if such a thing exists] D&D world stuff like humans, elves [the presence of drow would be an individual table call, mine would be a no], dwarves, halflings. Perhaps gnomes, half-elves, dragonborn, tieflings. Depending on the area the character is from: lizardmen, orcs, hobgoblins, half-orcs....are warforged medium or large? Goblins are "small" so they can't do that, since it has to be a creature "your size" and the changeling's size is medium, right? </p><p></p><p>Seems like the power is/would be significantly more useful in urban/intrigue/populated-type campaigns than dungeon delving.</p><p></p><p>So...yeah. I don't see it as being OP. In fact, as read, it could be U[nder]P if one were to interpret the "that you've seen" part to mean you can only become/change into a particular person/individual and not the type of creature they are. Which, to me, doesn't make a whole lot of [flavor] sense and they should definitely clear up the final language on that to make it clear they are talking about a species and not individuals only.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="steeldragons, post: 6518592, member: 92511"] Well. For one, as DM I would not permit a thri-kreen...assuming the changling had seen one in the first place. It is not a "humanoid." It is an insect. Yes, I know the term 'humanoid" is a creature type and the thri-kreen are, in fact, listed in the MM as "[I]humanoid (thri-kreen)[/I]", but I would say/rule the creature's additional limbs is a step too far to their abilities as, obviously, intended. Aarakocra, I would think the more likely issue is the Changeling will not have seen one. And, similarly, is not a humanoid. Aarakocra in 5e have separate wings. Their arms are not wings, as in former editions. So, the Changeling could not, actually, make themselves an aarakocra since (as with the thri-kreen) they can not give themselves additional limbs. The Merfolk, I have no issue with them doing that to be able to move/survive in an aquatic environment. Seems a perfectly reasonable and expected use of the power. However, again, the question then becomes, "When/where did your character see a merman [aquatic elf, locatha, etc...] to emulate?" The answer to any of those "you have seen" questions, for a game I were DMing would be "if it's not a common humanoid type [as one would see walking around town]" that if it hasn't happened "in play", then it hasn't happened. I don't think "saw it in a book" is sufficient for this ability, as written or intended, hence the "have seen" stipulation. So, for a "typical/standard" [if such a thing exists] D&D world stuff like humans, elves [the presence of drow would be an individual table call, mine would be a no], dwarves, halflings. Perhaps gnomes, half-elves, dragonborn, tieflings. Depending on the area the character is from: lizardmen, orcs, hobgoblins, half-orcs....are warforged medium or large? Goblins are "small" so they can't do that, since it has to be a creature "your size" and the changeling's size is medium, right? Seems like the power is/would be significantly more useful in urban/intrigue/populated-type campaigns than dungeon delving. So...yeah. I don't see it as being OP. In fact, as read, it could be U[nder]P if one were to interpret the "that you've seen" part to mean you can only become/change into a particular person/individual and not the type of creature they are. Which, to me, doesn't make a whole lot of [flavor] sense and they should definitely clear up the final language on that to make it clear they are talking about a species and not individuals only. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Changeling (from the UA article): crazy broken?
Top