Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Changes in Interpretation
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Iosue" data-source="post: 6013078" data-attributes="member: 6680772"><p>I think a whole lotta of this can just be laid the feet of edition change. One need only look at the change from 1e to 2e, which compared to 2e to 3e or 3e to 4e is hardly a change at all in terms of rules. Still, a whole lotta folks didn't make the switch, and a good many harbored resentment about it.</p><p> </p><p>For some reason WotC has historically been pretty oblivious to this kind of fan response. Per Jeff Grubb, when 3e was coming out one of the WotC folks said they didn't give a damn if any 2e people switched over. They came up with the plan of releasing a new edition every 10 years, with the .5 editions coming midway between. That may have worked, but they just haven't been able to stick with it. 3e in 2000. 3.5 in 2003. 4e in 2008. Essentials in 2010. And now 5e. Every change brewing at the very least the kind of resentment that the change from 1e to 2e engendered. Even more so, since a lot of folks find an edition they like, and then WotC pulls the rug out from under them.</p><p> </p><p>Unfortunately, this background undermines a lot of the good work they do. It doesn't matter how good 3e is at what it does, how good 4e is at what it does, how good 5e becomes. People feel that resentment a priori, before the new edition even comes out.</p><p> </p><p>The design folks have been suggesting that their intent is that they can put out 5e and just leave it out there for a much longer period, after which would follow minor changes in presentation (e.g. popular modules put into the core) rather than a wholesale re-design. I'd like to believe them, but I don't blame anyone for having extreme skepticism. I do believe that if WotC wants get the fanbase all playing D&D again, they need to come up with a new business model. If releasing the core books once and then trying to live on settings and splats (2e) doesn't work, and constant releasing of entirely new editions every five years brews resentment and kills the golden goose, then they need to do something else. And I think they need to play the long game, keeping everything that comes after as compatible as possible.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Iosue, post: 6013078, member: 6680772"] I think a whole lotta of this can just be laid the feet of edition change. One need only look at the change from 1e to 2e, which compared to 2e to 3e or 3e to 4e is hardly a change at all in terms of rules. Still, a whole lotta folks didn't make the switch, and a good many harbored resentment about it. For some reason WotC has historically been pretty oblivious to this kind of fan response. Per Jeff Grubb, when 3e was coming out one of the WotC folks said they didn't give a damn if any 2e people switched over. They came up with the plan of releasing a new edition every 10 years, with the .5 editions coming midway between. That may have worked, but they just haven't been able to stick with it. 3e in 2000. 3.5 in 2003. 4e in 2008. Essentials in 2010. And now 5e. Every change brewing at the very least the kind of resentment that the change from 1e to 2e engendered. Even more so, since a lot of folks find an edition they like, and then WotC pulls the rug out from under them. Unfortunately, this background undermines a lot of the good work they do. It doesn't matter how good 3e is at what it does, how good 4e is at what it does, how good 5e becomes. People feel that resentment a priori, before the new edition even comes out. The design folks have been suggesting that their intent is that they can put out 5e and just leave it out there for a much longer period, after which would follow minor changes in presentation (e.g. popular modules put into the core) rather than a wholesale re-design. I'd like to believe them, but I don't blame anyone for having extreme skepticism. I do believe that if WotC wants get the fanbase all playing D&D again, they need to come up with a new business model. If releasing the core books once and then trying to live on settings and splats (2e) doesn't work, and constant releasing of entirely new editions every five years brews resentment and kills the golden goose, then they need to do something else. And I think they need to play the long game, keeping everything that comes after as compatible as possible. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Changes in Interpretation
Top