Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Changes in Interpretation
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Manbearcat" data-source="post: 6017779" data-attributes="member: 6696971"><p>@<a href="http://www.enworld.org/forum/members/pemerton.html" target="_blank"><span style="color: #0000ff">pemerton</span></a></p><p> </p><p>I often forget to include the fundamentals of the framework of Skill Challenges, as I find them implicit, but I should include them on every post as it appears that there is a large contingency of people who do not understand the fundamentals. You seem to always do so and it appears helpful to dialogue so it may be a good idea to hammer home the following routinely.</p><p> </p><p>If I want to resolve a conflict of any variety (in this case an exploratory conflict) where stakes are involved, there are three dynamics that will be at work at the table:</p><p> </p><p>- WHEN is the conflict formally resolved? <span style="color: sandybrown">When the PCs reach their x number of success or their y number of failures.</span></p><p> </p><p>- By WHAT vessel does the fiction emerge and how empowering is that vessel? <span style="color: sandybrown">By the use of genre-logic and fiction-first interpretation of each succuess/failure (not linear process-simulation) that leads to genre-relevant, dynamic interchange between PCs and DMs. I (and I know this is not the standard, but it is not strictly forbidden) allow, and sometimes demand, that my PCs narrate the results of a specific roll. I pro-actively take the reins of the fictional culmination of their words (derived by the amalgamation of the fictional content preceeding the skill roll, the skill roll brought to bear to interact with that fictional content, and the pass/fail of that skill roll), create a new micro-conflict to resolve (again using fiction-first, genre-logic within the greater framework) and they react. This interchange continues until the conflict is resolved and the narrative is formally sculpted.</span></p><p> </p><p>- HOW well does that conflict resolution vessel capture the feel, spirit and conventions of the genre trope you're attempting to emulate/reproduce? <span style="color: sandybrown">The structure and the use of dynamic interpretation of results and subsequent narrative sculpting through fiction-first, genre-logic works as well as I could hope for in capturing the genre trope that is aimed at when the challenge is contrived.</span></p><p> </p><p>The Skill Challenge framework, as a narrative-sculpting pacing mechanism, answers each of those questions tangibly. It doesn't just hint at a framework that vaguely alludes to a formula. It is a formula.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Manbearcat, post: 6017779, member: 6696971"] @[URL="http://www.enworld.org/forum/members/pemerton.html"][COLOR=#0000ff]pemerton[/COLOR][/URL] I often forget to include the fundamentals of the framework of Skill Challenges, as I find them implicit, but I should include them on every post as it appears that there is a large contingency of people who do not understand the fundamentals. You seem to always do so and it appears helpful to dialogue so it may be a good idea to hammer home the following routinely. If I want to resolve a conflict of any variety (in this case an exploratory conflict) where stakes are involved, there are three dynamics that will be at work at the table: - WHEN is the conflict formally resolved? [COLOR=sandybrown]When the PCs reach their x number of success or their y number of failures.[/COLOR] - By WHAT vessel does the fiction emerge and how empowering is that vessel? [COLOR=sandybrown]By the use of genre-logic and fiction-first interpretation of each succuess/failure (not linear process-simulation) that leads to genre-relevant, dynamic interchange between PCs and DMs. I (and I know this is not the standard, but it is not strictly forbidden) allow, and sometimes demand, that my PCs narrate the results of a specific roll. I pro-actively take the reins of the fictional culmination of their words (derived by the amalgamation of the fictional content preceeding the skill roll, the skill roll brought to bear to interact with that fictional content, and the pass/fail of that skill roll), create a new micro-conflict to resolve (again using fiction-first, genre-logic within the greater framework) and they react. This interchange continues until the conflict is resolved and the narrative is formally sculpted.[/COLOR] - HOW well does that conflict resolution vessel capture the feel, spirit and conventions of the genre trope you're attempting to emulate/reproduce? [COLOR=sandybrown]The structure and the use of dynamic interpretation of results and subsequent narrative sculpting through fiction-first, genre-logic works as well as I could hope for in capturing the genre trope that is aimed at when the challenge is contrived.[/COLOR] The Skill Challenge framework, as a narrative-sculpting pacing mechanism, answers each of those questions tangibly. It doesn't just hint at a framework that vaguely alludes to a formula. It is a formula. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Changes in Interpretation
Top