Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Changes in Traditional Games
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="fanboy2000" data-source="post: 5350684" data-attributes="member: 19998"><p>So, over in the thread about the commercial for the Red Box, Raven Crowking made the following observation and question.</p><p></p><p>One of the side discussions in the thread is about the difference between the look of the new starter set (that it looks like the famous starter set from 1981) and the change in the contents. </p><p></p><p>It’s an interesting question and there is so much one can infer from it. First, there’s the answer. In the board games category, there is Monopoly (discussed in the other thread), Life, Careers, and Axis and Allies. This list is not, to my knowledge, exhaustive. Monopoly in particular has a long history of change, starting out as a game that was anti-monopolistic about a hundred years ago. In the video games category, there is Final Fantasy III which was released with updated graphics + a few other things on the PSP recently, IIRC. In the hobby games category, Warhammer (and it’s sibling, Warhammer 40k) have changed significantly in the past 25 years. </p><p></p><p>There are of course, games that don’t change. Western Chess has been the same for a very, very long time. Though there many Chess variants in different countries. Go has been substantially the same game for over 4,000 years. Backgammon had a change recently with the addition of the doubling cube, a change that spurred it’s popularity early in the 20th Century. But it could be argued that change wasn’t substantial. Many popular board games also go through minor changes that are mostly cosmetic in nature, thus substantiating Raven Crowking’s observation.</p><p></p><p>But what really interests me is the idea (not explicitly state in the quote) that the rules for traditional games stay the same for decades. That’s simply not true. First, traditional games are often subject to house rules. For example, when I play Rummy 500 with my fiancee we play that when you pick-up a discarded card you have to meld it right away. This isn’t, however, the way I was taught to play with my family. Monopoly is infamous for it’s house rules. I don’t know about now, but the ubiquitous house rule of putting money in the middle of the board for the person who lands on free parking used to not be in the rules at all.</p><p></p><p>I’m met people who don’t play Checkers (Draughts) where you have to jump if it’s available. Back in the Navy, I met someone who had never heard the rule and refused to play that way. </p><p></p><p>Second, Poker is famous for it’s many variations, each with their own fans. It used to be that when I heard people talk about poker with out a modifier of some kind, it was 5 card draw. Now, they're usually talking about Texas Hold'em.</p><p></p><p>This is true with a lot of games. Rummy has a number of variants. People often call a variant by just the main game's game. I don't know how many times I've called Rummy 500 just "Rummy." Also, I've seen variants within the same game. Euchre is a popular trick taking game using a smaller subset of the standard 52 card deck. The number of cards used seems to vary depending on what rulebook I have in hand. </p><p></p><p>500, an offshoot of Euchre, has a number of different "schedules" that change the value of certain outcomes.</p><p></p><p>Baccarat's an interesting game too. Today, in the U.S. the game is dictated entirely for you. The player has no say in whether or not to draw a card or stand. Go to France, however, and the game allows the player to make choices.</p><p></p><p>What’s really interesting about this is that the name “Hoyle” is on lots of books by different publishers (much like Roget’s and Webster’s) who publish different books with no ties to originator of the name. The reason that book is still valid is the same reason the 1981 Starter Set is still valid: if that’s what you and your group agree to play by, then that’s the game you’re playing.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="fanboy2000, post: 5350684, member: 19998"] So, over in the thread about the commercial for the Red Box, Raven Crowking made the following observation and question. One of the side discussions in the thread is about the difference between the look of the new starter set (that it looks like the famous starter set from 1981) and the change in the contents. It’s an interesting question and there is so much one can infer from it. First, there’s the answer. In the board games category, there is Monopoly (discussed in the other thread), Life, Careers, and Axis and Allies. This list is not, to my knowledge, exhaustive. Monopoly in particular has a long history of change, starting out as a game that was anti-monopolistic about a hundred years ago. In the video games category, there is Final Fantasy III which was released with updated graphics + a few other things on the PSP recently, IIRC. In the hobby games category, Warhammer (and it’s sibling, Warhammer 40k) have changed significantly in the past 25 years. There are of course, games that don’t change. Western Chess has been the same for a very, very long time. Though there many Chess variants in different countries. Go has been substantially the same game for over 4,000 years. Backgammon had a change recently with the addition of the doubling cube, a change that spurred it’s popularity early in the 20th Century. But it could be argued that change wasn’t substantial. Many popular board games also go through minor changes that are mostly cosmetic in nature, thus substantiating Raven Crowking’s observation. But what really interests me is the idea (not explicitly state in the quote) that the rules for traditional games stay the same for decades. That’s simply not true. First, traditional games are often subject to house rules. For example, when I play Rummy 500 with my fiancee we play that when you pick-up a discarded card you have to meld it right away. This isn’t, however, the way I was taught to play with my family. Monopoly is infamous for it’s house rules. I don’t know about now, but the ubiquitous house rule of putting money in the middle of the board for the person who lands on free parking used to not be in the rules at all. I’m met people who don’t play Checkers (Draughts) where you have to jump if it’s available. Back in the Navy, I met someone who had never heard the rule and refused to play that way. Second, Poker is famous for it’s many variations, each with their own fans. It used to be that when I heard people talk about poker with out a modifier of some kind, it was 5 card draw. Now, they're usually talking about Texas Hold'em. This is true with a lot of games. Rummy has a number of variants. People often call a variant by just the main game's game. I don't know how many times I've called Rummy 500 just "Rummy." Also, I've seen variants within the same game. Euchre is a popular trick taking game using a smaller subset of the standard 52 card deck. The number of cards used seems to vary depending on what rulebook I have in hand. 500, an offshoot of Euchre, has a number of different "schedules" that change the value of certain outcomes. Baccarat's an interesting game too. Today, in the U.S. the game is dictated entirely for you. The player has no say in whether or not to draw a card or stand. Go to France, however, and the game allows the player to make choices. What’s really interesting about this is that the name “Hoyle” is on lots of books by different publishers (much like Roget’s and Webster’s) who publish different books with no ties to originator of the name. The reason that book is still valid is the same reason the 1981 Starter Set is still valid: if that’s what you and your group agree to play by, then that’s the game you’re playing. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Changes in Traditional Games
Top