Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="TaranTheWanderer" data-source="post: 8063570" data-attributes="member: 15882">I don't mind advantage but I've always found it boring.&nbsp; But maybe my issue is more with the 'Help' action.The spirit of it (let's say in combat) is to do something that gives the other person an Advantage.&nbsp; Throw sand in an enemy's eye or something.&nbsp; But, most often, people just say,&quot;I use the Help Action&quot; on my turn.&quot;I'd rather if you were forced to roll something to give an Advantage.&nbsp; DC 10 athletics check to throw sand. (much easier than hitting an AC of 20 and will help the person who can actually hit that AC.)But Advantage isn't worth the effort and maybe that's why they just made Help action auto-succeed.&nbsp; If you have to roll a DC anything, you might as well attack.&nbsp; Which is a round-about way of explaining why I'm not totally happy with Advantage. It's not worth doing cool stuff in&nbsp; and out of combat to get it?Does that make sense to anyone???</blockquote>

[QUOTE="TaranTheWanderer, post: 8063570, member: 15882"] I don't mind advantage but I've always found it boring. But maybe my issue is more with the 'Help' action. The spirit of it (let's say in combat) is to do something that gives the other person an Advantage. Throw sand in an enemy's eye or something. But, most often, people just say,"I use the Help Action" on my turn." I'd rather if you were forced to roll something to give an Advantage. DC 10 athletics check to throw sand. (much easier than hitting an AC of 20 and will help the person who can actually hit that AC.) But Advantage isn't worth the effort and maybe that's why they just made Help action auto-succeed. If you have to roll a DC anything, you might as well attack. Which is a round-about way of explaining why I'm not totally happy with Advantage. It's not worth doing cool stuff in and out of combat to get it? Does that make sense to anyone??? [/QUOTE]

Verification