Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Changes to the Command spell and its use at the table.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ECMO3" data-source="post: 9863526" data-attributes="member: 7030563"><p>I would rule that is not the "fastest available means" moreover you would not tell me anything if you failed the save, I would tell you where you are going. I don't believe the being that failed the save has any agency here.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>So this relies on an alternative and admittedly ambiguous definition of the sentence and phrasing.</p><p></p><p>the wording is:</p><p></p><p><em>".. moving away from you by the fastest available means."</em></p><p></p><p>The spell clearly requires this. If you interpret the term "fastest" as a magnitude which only applies to the means then it is simply the fastest speed you can obtain regardless of direction and the direction can be any that is away. If you interpret it as a vector quantity measured in a specific direction, which is certainly what is intended IMO, then spiraling around is not the "fastest" unless there is something that restricts you from moving away in a linear fashion.</p><p></p><p>To illustrate this if we are in NYC and I say to get in your car and drive to LA by the <em>"fastest available means" </em>you could take that to mean drive your car as fast as it will possibly go but not necessarily in the direction that gets you closest to LA, or you could take it to mean drive it in the manner and route that gets you to LA the fastest. Your interpretation is consistent with the former, mine is consistent with the latter.</p><p></p><p>Moving as fast as possible in a fashion that also moves you some amount further away is not the same moving away as fast as possible and I think the spell requires the latter.</p><p></p><p>So suffice it to say I think this interpretation could be a RAW interpretation, but I do not agree with it and it is not the only possible one.</p><p></p><p>I will also add that accepting that definition here could also affect other spells including Fear, Dissonant Whispers and Compulsion.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I think the specific hypotheticals we are talking about now are strawmen that I have never seen in play, which were originally proposed by people who's real purpose is to present an argument to weaken the spell in highly situational circumstances that do rarely occur (i.e. running across lava or off of a cliff).</p><p></p><p>I think the designers did not intend to have people use the spell to find a secret door or difficult terrain and I've never seen that done. If the invisible wall situation happened in my game I probably would not even remember it or this thread. But I think the designers very much do intend to have people run across lava or off a cliff if these are the fastest means and they even changed the specifics and took out wording regarding self harm to facilitate exactly that.</p><p></p><p>If you accept that, then the rest of the hypothetical examples I commented on are just consistent application of the mechanics to satisfy those hypothetical strawmen.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>No.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ECMO3, post: 9863526, member: 7030563"] I would rule that is not the "fastest available means" moreover you would not tell me anything if you failed the save, I would tell you where you are going. I don't believe the being that failed the save has any agency here. So this relies on an alternative and admittedly ambiguous definition of the sentence and phrasing. the wording is: [I]".. moving away from you by the fastest available means."[/I] The spell clearly requires this. If you interpret the term "fastest" as a magnitude which only applies to the means then it is simply the fastest speed you can obtain regardless of direction and the direction can be any that is away. If you interpret it as a vector quantity measured in a specific direction, which is certainly what is intended IMO, then spiraling around is not the "fastest" unless there is something that restricts you from moving away in a linear fashion. To illustrate this if we are in NYC and I say to get in your car and drive to LA by the [I]"fastest available means" [/I]you could take that to mean drive your car as fast as it will possibly go but not necessarily in the direction that gets you closest to LA, or you could take it to mean drive it in the manner and route that gets you to LA the fastest. Your interpretation is consistent with the former, mine is consistent with the latter. Moving as fast as possible in a fashion that also moves you some amount further away is not the same moving away as fast as possible and I think the spell requires the latter. So suffice it to say I think this interpretation could be a RAW interpretation, but I do not agree with it and it is not the only possible one. I will also add that accepting that definition here could also affect other spells including Fear, Dissonant Whispers and Compulsion. I think the specific hypotheticals we are talking about now are strawmen that I have never seen in play, which were originally proposed by people who's real purpose is to present an argument to weaken the spell in highly situational circumstances that do rarely occur (i.e. running across lava or off of a cliff). I think the designers did not intend to have people use the spell to find a secret door or difficult terrain and I've never seen that done. If the invisible wall situation happened in my game I probably would not even remember it or this thread. But I think the designers very much do intend to have people run across lava or off a cliff if these are the fastest means and they even changed the specifics and took out wording regarding self harm to facilitate exactly that. If you accept that, then the rest of the hypothetical examples I commented on are just consistent application of the mechanics to satisfy those hypothetical strawmen. No. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Changes to the Command spell and its use at the table.
Top