Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Changing Expertise and Ability Check Resolution - House Rule
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="jodyjohnson" data-source="post: 7246505" data-attributes="member: 5590"><p>I'm going to use Int as an example.</p><p></p><p>Between 2 and 3 Int a character gains the ability to speak (Feeblemind or animal to human range intelligence)</p><p></p><p>It is pretty common for characters with a certain Int to not be able to read - then 1 point higher they can read. Maybe Grog going from Int 6 to Int 7.</p><p></p><p>Going from 1 in a stat to zero usually indicates going from somewhat functional to non-functional.</p><p></p><p>So there are other examples where there is a jump in ability from a single stat point.</p><p></p><p>But backing up, one of the original thoughts was that some DMs were already changing the DC based on some traits or ability and my thought was to nail it down mechanically so a player would know when I make the decision on changing the DC. Since +2 ability bonus is the same as Proficiency at 1st it seemed a natural point to say - if you have a +2 you have natural ability that would provide the same quantum leap in ability that proficiency would.</p><p></p><p>To reiterate I'm operating more under the middle path when results on both ends are fiat and the dice are only rolled when the result is in doubt. If one preferred the 'dice decide' route then it doesn't really apply because one might want the linear scale rather than having the big jump between +1 or lower and +2 or higher or prof.</p><p></p><p>For knowing when to change the DC for the minority number of static DC checks, the player says their bonus when they declare actions. If it is +1 or lower I know that it doesn't change but if it is +2 or higher it would require a 14+ stat or proficiency (not precisely - from 1st to 4th level a character could take a prof with a -1 stat but does that really happen?).</p><p></p><p>Again, the -5 to DC only applies to static checks and not opposed checks, or degree of success checks. The majority of these are Lore checks. Most of the other checks for stats are opposed checks or determine degrees of success.</p><p></p><p>To simplify:</p><p>Expertise: you can apply your proficiency bonus in place of your stat bonus (effectively double prof instead of stat+prof).</p><p>On ability checks with a Static DC, the DM has the discretion to raise the DC if your bonus is only +1 or lower to represent lack of ability or proficiency. (I agree that maybe reversing it would be more intuitive but maybe that tends too much toward punishing low stats instead of rewarding higher stats).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="jodyjohnson, post: 7246505, member: 5590"] I'm going to use Int as an example. Between 2 and 3 Int a character gains the ability to speak (Feeblemind or animal to human range intelligence) It is pretty common for characters with a certain Int to not be able to read - then 1 point higher they can read. Maybe Grog going from Int 6 to Int 7. Going from 1 in a stat to zero usually indicates going from somewhat functional to non-functional. So there are other examples where there is a jump in ability from a single stat point. But backing up, one of the original thoughts was that some DMs were already changing the DC based on some traits or ability and my thought was to nail it down mechanically so a player would know when I make the decision on changing the DC. Since +2 ability bonus is the same as Proficiency at 1st it seemed a natural point to say - if you have a +2 you have natural ability that would provide the same quantum leap in ability that proficiency would. To reiterate I'm operating more under the middle path when results on both ends are fiat and the dice are only rolled when the result is in doubt. If one preferred the 'dice decide' route then it doesn't really apply because one might want the linear scale rather than having the big jump between +1 or lower and +2 or higher or prof. For knowing when to change the DC for the minority number of static DC checks, the player says their bonus when they declare actions. If it is +1 or lower I know that it doesn't change but if it is +2 or higher it would require a 14+ stat or proficiency (not precisely - from 1st to 4th level a character could take a prof with a -1 stat but does that really happen?). Again, the -5 to DC only applies to static checks and not opposed checks, or degree of success checks. The majority of these are Lore checks. Most of the other checks for stats are opposed checks or determine degrees of success. To simplify: Expertise: you can apply your proficiency bonus in place of your stat bonus (effectively double prof instead of stat+prof). On ability checks with a Static DC, the DM has the discretion to raise the DC if your bonus is only +1 or lower to represent lack of ability or proficiency. (I agree that maybe reversing it would be more intuitive but maybe that tends too much toward punishing low stats instead of rewarding higher stats). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Changing Expertise and Ability Check Resolution - House Rule
Top