Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D Older Editions
Changing the 4e save mechanism.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MrMyth" data-source="post: 4506153" data-attributes="member: 61155"><p>To be fair, they don't have the same chance of falling off the cliff - since the peasant is just about guaranteed to be hit by the Wizard, while the Fighter is likely to shrug off the Thunderwave. Even if they do get hit, the Fighter may well have a variety of magic items to help them if they do get knocked off the cliff, while the peasant will simply die. </p><p> </p><p>But there is some rational behind making the roll to avoid falling identical all around - it isn't based on your spell, but on the ability of either fellow to grab ahold of the edge of the cliff. (Though this also seems like the epic level fighter should be better at.) </p><p> </p><p>In the end, the save mechanic is a somewhat odd fit here - it seems like they simply grabbed a useful mechanic to fit this one specific circumstance. They wanted some way to prevent push effects from being instant-kills, without having to work out a complicated sub-system involving athletics and acrobatics (which would inevitably result in some characters always going over the edge, and others never doing so.) </p><p> </p><p>I think, as far as game mechanics go, the system they have in place (for avoiding being pushed off ledges) works - but conceptually, it is a little weird. I think making small modifiers to it - bonuses for Athletics or Acrobatics, for example - is both reasonable and balanced. I think fully overhauling it with a different system would probably be a lot of work for very little gain, but I don't think it would unbalance 4E all that significantly.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MrMyth, post: 4506153, member: 61155"] To be fair, they don't have the same chance of falling off the cliff - since the peasant is just about guaranteed to be hit by the Wizard, while the Fighter is likely to shrug off the Thunderwave. Even if they do get hit, the Fighter may well have a variety of magic items to help them if they do get knocked off the cliff, while the peasant will simply die. But there is some rational behind making the roll to avoid falling identical all around - it isn't based on your spell, but on the ability of either fellow to grab ahold of the edge of the cliff. (Though this also seems like the epic level fighter should be better at.) In the end, the save mechanic is a somewhat odd fit here - it seems like they simply grabbed a useful mechanic to fit this one specific circumstance. They wanted some way to prevent push effects from being instant-kills, without having to work out a complicated sub-system involving athletics and acrobatics (which would inevitably result in some characters always going over the edge, and others never doing so.) I think, as far as game mechanics go, the system they have in place (for avoiding being pushed off ledges) works - but conceptually, it is a little weird. I think making small modifiers to it - bonuses for Athletics or Acrobatics, for example - is both reasonable and balanced. I think fully overhauling it with a different system would probably be a lot of work for very little gain, but I don't think it would unbalance 4E all that significantly. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D Older Editions
Changing the 4e save mechanism.
Top