Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Changing the meaning of Passive Perception and Insight => Suscipion rather than Facts
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mustrum_Ridcully" data-source="post: 5676048" data-attributes="member: 710"><p>The title might be a little clunky, but it's difficult to put the idea into short words.</p><p></p><p>[MENTION=90399]TheClone[/MENTION] mentioned to me an issue he had with the way passive perception and standard DCs in the game worked. Basically, if your perception is maxed out for your level, you will beat all passive perception DCs if you only use the DC table by level.</p><p></p><p>This takes a little bit out of the potential for mystery, unless you deliberately put higher level challenges in.</p><p></p><p>So, my alternative take is that Passive Perception and Insight doesn't mean automatically noticing whatever triggered the passive check, but just noticing that something is amiss. </p><p></p><p>In game mechanical terms, if a characters passive perception or insight check is succesful, he gets to make an actual perception or insight roll.</p><p></p><p>If he succeeds, he observes whatever was being concealed. If not, the character has basically seen something out of the corner of his eyes or is feeling the goosebumps, but he doesn't quite know what it is.</p><p></p><p>A failed check would not allow the other PCs to act in any particular manner to allow making them their own perception checks, unless the situation changes enough to warrant a new passive check.*</p><p>The DM might give a bonus to all character's passive checks from that point on, to represent the heightened alertness of the group, but otherwise, things go on as if no one would have succeeded with the check. (For combat situations to determine surprise, the enemy might still get the surprise round, but the player characters get a bonus to their initiative.)</p><p></p><p>Obviously, this weakens the value of good passive perception values somewhat, but it also increases the level of suspsense possible. </p><p></p><p></p><p>*) Keep in mind that sometimes situation changes can be triggered by the characters. For example, if they think someone might be following them, now one player might decide to hide and distance himself a little from the group to find the pursuers. This could trigger new checks - acive or passive. But there must happen some kind of activity.</p><p></p><p>In some ways, this is already in the realm of the DM to decide, since it is ultimately his decision what a (passive) perception check is for. This could be a house rule that is understood between DM and players, or it's just a ruling used for certain scenarios that a DM might consider.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mustrum_Ridcully, post: 5676048, member: 710"] The title might be a little clunky, but it's difficult to put the idea into short words. [MENTION=90399]TheClone[/MENTION] mentioned to me an issue he had with the way passive perception and standard DCs in the game worked. Basically, if your perception is maxed out for your level, you will beat all passive perception DCs if you only use the DC table by level. This takes a little bit out of the potential for mystery, unless you deliberately put higher level challenges in. So, my alternative take is that Passive Perception and Insight doesn't mean automatically noticing whatever triggered the passive check, but just noticing that something is amiss. In game mechanical terms, if a characters passive perception or insight check is succesful, he gets to make an actual perception or insight roll. If he succeeds, he observes whatever was being concealed. If not, the character has basically seen something out of the corner of his eyes or is feeling the goosebumps, but he doesn't quite know what it is. A failed check would not allow the other PCs to act in any particular manner to allow making them their own perception checks, unless the situation changes enough to warrant a new passive check.* The DM might give a bonus to all character's passive checks from that point on, to represent the heightened alertness of the group, but otherwise, things go on as if no one would have succeeded with the check. (For combat situations to determine surprise, the enemy might still get the surprise round, but the player characters get a bonus to their initiative.) Obviously, this weakens the value of good passive perception values somewhat, but it also increases the level of suspsense possible. *) Keep in mind that sometimes situation changes can be triggered by the characters. For example, if they think someone might be following them, now one player might decide to hide and distance himself a little from the group to find the pursuers. This could trigger new checks - acive or passive. But there must happen some kind of activity. In some ways, this is already in the realm of the DM to decide, since it is ultimately his decision what a (passive) perception check is for. This could be a house rule that is understood between DM and players, or it's just a ruling used for certain scenarios that a DM might consider. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Changing the meaning of Passive Perception and Insight => Suscipion rather than Facts
Top