Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Quickleaf" data-source="post: 7035158" data-attributes="member: 20323">Yep, great minds <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> That's an interesting idea! I think it works fine for most cases of PCs casting against monsters/NPCs (since the main vector for monsters suffering damage is usually the PCs). But it doesn't work so well for monsters/NPCs casting sleep against PCs, since PCs can have scrapes and scratches and bruises from other adventuring scenarios.I'll think about it.Looking over my first try, I can already see that the 3 saves thing I borrowed works for&nbsp; single-target spell like flesh to stone, but for a multi-target spell like sleep is going to be a pain-in-the butt amount of dice rolling. And more saving throws multiplied by a group of monsters mean that just by sheer probability putting a group of weak monsters to sleep has lower odds. Probably not ideal.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Quickleaf, post: 7035158, member: 20323"] Yep, great minds :) That's an interesting idea! I think it works fine for most cases of PCs casting against monsters/NPCs (since the main vector for monsters suffering damage is usually the PCs). But it doesn't work so well for monsters/NPCs casting [I]sleep[/I] against PCs, since PCs can have scrapes and scratches and bruises from other adventuring scenarios. I'll think about it. Looking over my first try, I can already see that the 3 saves thing I borrowed works for single-target spell like [I]flesh to stone[/I], but for a multi-target spell like [I]sleep[/I] is going to be a pain-in-the butt amount of dice rolling. And more saving throws multiplied by a group of monsters mean that just by sheer probability putting a group of weak monsters to sleep has lower odds. Probably not ideal. [/QUOTE]

Verification