Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Character ability v. player volition: INT, WIS, CHA
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Celebrim" data-source="post: 4978575" data-attributes="member: 4937"><p>One of two situations develop usually develop: either the player ignores what is written on his character sheet and plays as a full member of the party rather than as a fool member of the party, or else the rest of the party must deal with a member of the party whose play is fundamentally anti-social.</p><p></p><p>For this reason, I tend to frown on players taking excessively low mental attributes for their characters. It can be pulled off by a clever experienced role-player who is able to invent ways to excuse his characters insight and cleverness, but this is really rare. It's is however really funny when pulled off correctly and you have a good straight man playing the smarter character in the party. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Absolutely. I have no desire to game with people who don't play their character. If they can't help but be themselves in the game, they should play a character whose personality is much like their own.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>In my opinion, you have to carefully balance these things. You have to play what is written on the sheet and take a back seat in problem solving and NPC persuasion, but you also have to not keep yourself out of the game to the point that it becomes unfun for the other players. So, if you see a way through the problem, you need to come up with some excuse for solving the problem by accident or foolishness, or providing some hint under the veneer of stupidity. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>As a brick. If you don't want to play a submoron with a 60 word vocabulary and limited ability to even dress themselves, then don't take a 5 as your INT. I'm not saying that a really good roleplayer couldn't make a very memorable and even sympathetic character out of a PC that was dumber than Forest Gump, but in my experience actually playing such a character was seldom the motivation of the player or even considered by the character during character creation.</p><p></p><p>If you do take a 5 as your INT (for whatever reason) and don't even try to play the character, expect to take an experience point penalty at my table. I find such behavior as offensive as cheating.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Celebrim, post: 4978575, member: 4937"] One of two situations develop usually develop: either the player ignores what is written on his character sheet and plays as a full member of the party rather than as a fool member of the party, or else the rest of the party must deal with a member of the party whose play is fundamentally anti-social. For this reason, I tend to frown on players taking excessively low mental attributes for their characters. It can be pulled off by a clever experienced role-player who is able to invent ways to excuse his characters insight and cleverness, but this is really rare. It's is however really funny when pulled off correctly and you have a good straight man playing the smarter character in the party. Absolutely. I have no desire to game with people who don't play their character. If they can't help but be themselves in the game, they should play a character whose personality is much like their own. In my opinion, you have to carefully balance these things. You have to play what is written on the sheet and take a back seat in problem solving and NPC persuasion, but you also have to not keep yourself out of the game to the point that it becomes unfun for the other players. So, if you see a way through the problem, you need to come up with some excuse for solving the problem by accident or foolishness, or providing some hint under the veneer of stupidity. As a brick. If you don't want to play a submoron with a 60 word vocabulary and limited ability to even dress themselves, then don't take a 5 as your INT. I'm not saying that a really good roleplayer couldn't make a very memorable and even sympathetic character out of a PC that was dumber than Forest Gump, but in my experience actually playing such a character was seldom the motivation of the player or even considered by the character during character creation. If you do take a 5 as your INT (for whatever reason) and don't even try to play the character, expect to take an experience point penalty at my table. I find such behavior as offensive as cheating. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Character ability v. player volition: INT, WIS, CHA
Top