Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Voadam" data-source="post: 4978644" data-attributes="member: 2209">Sure.I'm really bad with skills, but great with tactics and chess puzzles. (Low int)I'm great with tactics but horrible at puzzles (Low Int or high int)I'm really a master at wizard spells, but I can't for the life of me remember what the chess pieces do (high int).I'm really poor at noticing things, but I'm rarely foolish (Low wis)I have a strong will but I'm often foolish (Low wis or high wis)I'm foolish but I'm really a wiz at casting cleric spells (High wis).I'm strikingly attractive but not a strong personality (High or low cha)I'm very unattractive but a striking personality (High or low Cha).I see the stats as written as broad enough to encompass most anything you want to roleplay and have it be supported. I see the mechanical limits alone as sufficient representation of the mechanical stats.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Voadam, post: 4978644, member: 2209"] Sure. I'm really bad with skills, but great with tactics and chess puzzles. (Low int) I'm great with tactics but horrible at puzzles (Low Int or high int) I'm really a master at wizard spells, but I can't for the life of me remember what the chess pieces do (high int). I'm really poor at noticing things, but I'm rarely foolish (Low wis) I have a strong will but I'm often foolish (Low wis or high wis) I'm foolish but I'm really a wiz at casting cleric spells (High wis). I'm strikingly attractive but not a strong personality (High or low cha) I'm very unattractive but a striking personality (High or low Cha). I see the stats as written as broad enough to encompass most anything you want to roleplay and have it be supported. I see the mechanical limits alone as sufficient representation of the mechanical stats. [/QUOTE]

Verification