Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Character ability v. player volition: INT, WIS, CHA
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Celebrim" data-source="post: 4978849" data-attributes="member: 4937"><p>Because, as I said, in the first place, it's very easy to evade most mechanical penalties. A decent power gamer is going to select disadvantages that provide no mechanical penalty that they care about at all. Besides which, imposing mechanical penalties that effect player choice regularly gets to be very irritating for both the DM and the player. If the player takes the initiative to act out his disadvantage (this is more applicable to systems other than D&D, say GURPS) there is little need to go to the blunt instrument of mechanical enforcement.</p><p></p><p>And in the second case, as I previously indicated, it is because this sort of behavior tends to irritate other players as well. Often times they see it - rightly IMO - as an attempt to hog the greater share of the spotlight and glory for themselves, while doing nothing to entertain the other players. It's just not good teamwork to say, "My player is good at everything.", which is at the core of the game what the rules exist to prevent.</p><p></p><p>As to why I care in the third place, the answer is very simple - if the PC's don't roleplay well, the game becomes rather unentertaining. A gamer who dumps stats all his mental and social abilities expecting to rely on his ability, knowledge, and cunning as a player to be cunning, charming, persuasive is in my experience not only not at all interested in roleplaying but very likely to begin to argue in a metagame fashion about how my ruling that the player's charming, persuasive, reasonable statements ought not to have provoked a negative reaction from the NPC 'merely' because a dice throw indicated a fumbled diplomacy check from his CHR 4 oaf. I care because the game just is more fun to play when the player takes the responcibility for policing themselves rather than trying to see how far they can push, manipulate, or bend the system (and hense me).</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>So what? No one likely to pull this kind of stunt will dump stat INT when playing a wizard.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Again, someone who is playing a character that communicates 'low, dumb cunning' is probably entertaining, and probably would have never dump stated in the first place and instead is playing the 11 INT as meaning 'not that intellectual but has a low dumb cunning'. Someone who takes 6 INT as a dump stat and then plays the character as a mastermind probably isn't ever in character and hense never entertains and probably has this whole adversarial PC vs. the DM thing going.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Assuming that the player's have characters in the first place. It's the blatant lack of characterization and of any thought actually given to character (as opposed to 'system mastery') that is the heart of my problem with this.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Celebrim, post: 4978849, member: 4937"] Because, as I said, in the first place, it's very easy to evade most mechanical penalties. A decent power gamer is going to select disadvantages that provide no mechanical penalty that they care about at all. Besides which, imposing mechanical penalties that effect player choice regularly gets to be very irritating for both the DM and the player. If the player takes the initiative to act out his disadvantage (this is more applicable to systems other than D&D, say GURPS) there is little need to go to the blunt instrument of mechanical enforcement. And in the second case, as I previously indicated, it is because this sort of behavior tends to irritate other players as well. Often times they see it - rightly IMO - as an attempt to hog the greater share of the spotlight and glory for themselves, while doing nothing to entertain the other players. It's just not good teamwork to say, "My player is good at everything.", which is at the core of the game what the rules exist to prevent. As to why I care in the third place, the answer is very simple - if the PC's don't roleplay well, the game becomes rather unentertaining. A gamer who dumps stats all his mental and social abilities expecting to rely on his ability, knowledge, and cunning as a player to be cunning, charming, persuasive is in my experience not only not at all interested in roleplaying but very likely to begin to argue in a metagame fashion about how my ruling that the player's charming, persuasive, reasonable statements ought not to have provoked a negative reaction from the NPC 'merely' because a dice throw indicated a fumbled diplomacy check from his CHR 4 oaf. I care because the game just is more fun to play when the player takes the responcibility for policing themselves rather than trying to see how far they can push, manipulate, or bend the system (and hense me). So what? No one likely to pull this kind of stunt will dump stat INT when playing a wizard. Again, someone who is playing a character that communicates 'low, dumb cunning' is probably entertaining, and probably would have never dump stated in the first place and instead is playing the 11 INT as meaning 'not that intellectual but has a low dumb cunning'. Someone who takes 6 INT as a dump stat and then plays the character as a mastermind probably isn't ever in character and hense never entertains and probably has this whole adversarial PC vs. the DM thing going. Assuming that the player's have characters in the first place. It's the blatant lack of characterization and of any thought actually given to character (as opposed to 'system mastery') that is the heart of my problem with this. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Character ability v. player volition: INT, WIS, CHA
Top