Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Character Classes should Mean Something in the Setting
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Xeviat" data-source="post: 8248716" data-attributes="member: 57494"><p>I agree with the principal. That's why I like smaller class lists. The 12 classes of the PHB were my ideal; I felt most archetypes could be made with them. It took me a while, but I came on board to the Artificer as a class, because it is a firm archetype that cannot really be done with the existing classes.</p><p></p><p>I'm still on the fence personally about the Warlord: part of me can see it as it's own class, part of me can see blending it with the bard and making thr bard broader, and part of me sees splitting the warlord up into fighter and rogue subclasses. </p><p></p><p>I still hold onto hope that we will get a Mystic. I even see the Monk as a potential "half-mystic".</p><p></p><p>The primary spellcasters are firmly tied to the setting. Personally, I think Warlock and Sorcerer could be blended and have the difference between blood and pact be fluff or a choice in the class.</p><p></p><p>Likewise, Bard, Druid, Monk, Paladin, and Warlock feel very tied to the core D&D assumptions. It's been pointed out to me recently that the Cleric is very culturally specific too.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Xeviat, post: 8248716, member: 57494"] I agree with the principal. That's why I like smaller class lists. The 12 classes of the PHB were my ideal; I felt most archetypes could be made with them. It took me a while, but I came on board to the Artificer as a class, because it is a firm archetype that cannot really be done with the existing classes. I'm still on the fence personally about the Warlord: part of me can see it as it's own class, part of me can see blending it with the bard and making thr bard broader, and part of me sees splitting the warlord up into fighter and rogue subclasses. I still hold onto hope that we will get a Mystic. I even see the Monk as a potential "half-mystic". The primary spellcasters are firmly tied to the setting. Personally, I think Warlock and Sorcerer could be blended and have the difference between blood and pact be fluff or a choice in the class. Likewise, Bard, Druid, Monk, Paladin, and Warlock feel very tied to the core D&D assumptions. It's been pointed out to me recently that the Cleric is very culturally specific too. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Character Classes should Mean Something in the Setting
Top