Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Character Classes should Mean Something in the Setting
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Steampunkette" data-source="post: 8253520" data-attributes="member: 6796468"><p>D&D, more than any game system I've ever known, has something I like to call "Metanarrative Mechanics". Things like the Vancian Spellcasting idea (which is far from what Vance wrote, as noted). It makes massive assumptions about the structure of magic in any given setting, for example. They are to writing what firmware is to computer engineering. Not quite Software (Fluff) and not quite Hardware (Crunch).</p><p></p><p>Character races are often presented as a sort of Metanarrative Mechanic. It's why Elves are immune to sleep and Trance for 4 hours, after all, even though there's nothing in "Elfdom" within popular fantasy outside of D&D that makes them so. It was a Chainmail mechanic to give them a rock paper scissors advantage against the undead faction, but it became a core identifier of "D&D Elfiness".</p><p></p><p>Even in settings where that sort of mechanic or identity isn't actually -needed-, it is generally preserved just because "That's what D&D Elfs are like".</p><p></p><p>A lot of the metanarrative comes from previous editions. Not just Chainmail, but things like Dual-Classing and Multi-Classing from earlier editions shape our perceptions of what an elf is or isn't and shapes how designers create mechanics going forward. Which is why you -could- make a 5e Elf Barbarian at launch but wind up with poor stat bonuses to support your character, regardless of personal narrative. Then D&D went OGL and gave "D&D Elves" to everyone, including Pathfinder.</p><p></p><p>So yes. I think Dark Sun is D&D. Because metanarrative elements like these existed. There were dragons on Athas, but they're gone save the Sorcerer-Kings' aspirations. There's Vancian Casting, but it is inherently dangerous/destructive to use. Athas even exists in the shared "Mindspace" of D&D through Planescape and other metanarrative ideas, because it is -explicitly- difficult to reach. In the Black Spine Adventures Gith managed to make it to Athas through a single portal, but once it was closed they became trapped on "this" side, forever.</p><p></p><p>In the very limited description I proffered and your rebuttal of it, you shot down pretty much every metanarrative concept I put up as "These things are Quintessentially D&D", though granted I did focus on physical elements like spells, magic items, and creatures. That then spawned a different side-discussion about whether or not your game is or isn't "Really" D&D. This was not my intention in presenting those things and I apologize.</p><p></p><p>It's not and shouldn't be "This is a game that doesn't have Dungeons -and- Dragons in it, therefore it is not Dungeons and Dragons!" it should be: "These are quintessential elements of D&D that immediately spring to mind and help shape any world due to the metanarrative concepts tied to them, which is why we're saying D&D isn't as 'Generic Fantasy' as a lot of people seem to think. Stripping them away does not remove the fact that saying 'D&D in Space' immediately conjures them because they're a huge part of what D&D's identity is, at it's core".</p><p></p><p>And then through miscommunication my statement became an insult, rather than an explanation.</p><p></p><p>Though, yeah, my Big Mac analogy fell flat on it's face because I was having issues describing the metanarrative difference between D&D and the d20 system through what at the time seemed adequate allegory.</p><p></p><p>1) D&D is Greyhawk. They were developed, hand in hand, as Gary Gygax's personal world and system after he and Arnesen and their friends reached the limits of what they could do with Chain Mail in the early 70s. That's where a lot of the metanarrative elements come from, like the aforementioned Elf-Trance and Sleep-Immunity. Something that Forgotten Realms included in it's elves because Greenwood based his setting on the D&D game system, since that was the system he was using, and the metanarrative elements carried over.</p><p></p><p>It isn't a hodge-podge. It's a very specific fantasy that has been put into different settings and identities, but there's a reason Mordenkainen can be found in Curse of Strahd and Bigby's Grasping Hand is still a spell in Dragonlance.</p><p></p><p>2) I -wholehearedly- agree! If something doesn't fit your setting/narrative you wanna tell, cut it, unless you can find some new angle to insert it that fits what you want to do. There are no Catfolk in the Ashen Lands. But I have come to like the idea of Sorcerers as the "Magical 1%" narrative. Makes for an interesting sociological angle to play with. It's also why I wound up giving Bards Patrons. Not Warlock Patrons, but explicit narrative patrons as rich people paying their way in the world.</p><p></p><p>3) Restriction can breed creativity. Or frustration. Collaboration is almost always preferred, in my book. Even if that means someone doesn't get to play -exactly- what they want. For example I won't let anyone play a Werewolf at my table 'cause it's a major hassle for me to balance encounters and the like. But they can play a Shifter Barbarian and RP their character "Wolfing Out" when they rage. Y'know, so long as werewolves are a thing in the setting that it's appropriate for a character to play.</p><p></p><p></p><p>S'okay! I'll go ahead and stop, at this point, as well. But I spent much of yesterday avoiding ENWorld because I knew the insult I had caused, however unintentionally, and wanted to do my best to avoid it, again, when I replied. I really am sorry.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Steampunkette, post: 8253520, member: 6796468"] D&D, more than any game system I've ever known, has something I like to call "Metanarrative Mechanics". Things like the Vancian Spellcasting idea (which is far from what Vance wrote, as noted). It makes massive assumptions about the structure of magic in any given setting, for example. They are to writing what firmware is to computer engineering. Not quite Software (Fluff) and not quite Hardware (Crunch). Character races are often presented as a sort of Metanarrative Mechanic. It's why Elves are immune to sleep and Trance for 4 hours, after all, even though there's nothing in "Elfdom" within popular fantasy outside of D&D that makes them so. It was a Chainmail mechanic to give them a rock paper scissors advantage against the undead faction, but it became a core identifier of "D&D Elfiness". Even in settings where that sort of mechanic or identity isn't actually -needed-, it is generally preserved just because "That's what D&D Elfs are like". A lot of the metanarrative comes from previous editions. Not just Chainmail, but things like Dual-Classing and Multi-Classing from earlier editions shape our perceptions of what an elf is or isn't and shapes how designers create mechanics going forward. Which is why you -could- make a 5e Elf Barbarian at launch but wind up with poor stat bonuses to support your character, regardless of personal narrative. Then D&D went OGL and gave "D&D Elves" to everyone, including Pathfinder. So yes. I think Dark Sun is D&D. Because metanarrative elements like these existed. There were dragons on Athas, but they're gone save the Sorcerer-Kings' aspirations. There's Vancian Casting, but it is inherently dangerous/destructive to use. Athas even exists in the shared "Mindspace" of D&D through Planescape and other metanarrative ideas, because it is -explicitly- difficult to reach. In the Black Spine Adventures Gith managed to make it to Athas through a single portal, but once it was closed they became trapped on "this" side, forever. In the very limited description I proffered and your rebuttal of it, you shot down pretty much every metanarrative concept I put up as "These things are Quintessentially D&D", though granted I did focus on physical elements like spells, magic items, and creatures. That then spawned a different side-discussion about whether or not your game is or isn't "Really" D&D. This was not my intention in presenting those things and I apologize. It's not and shouldn't be "This is a game that doesn't have Dungeons -and- Dragons in it, therefore it is not Dungeons and Dragons!" it should be: "These are quintessential elements of D&D that immediately spring to mind and help shape any world due to the metanarrative concepts tied to them, which is why we're saying D&D isn't as 'Generic Fantasy' as a lot of people seem to think. Stripping them away does not remove the fact that saying 'D&D in Space' immediately conjures them because they're a huge part of what D&D's identity is, at it's core". And then through miscommunication my statement became an insult, rather than an explanation. Though, yeah, my Big Mac analogy fell flat on it's face because I was having issues describing the metanarrative difference between D&D and the d20 system through what at the time seemed adequate allegory. 1) D&D is Greyhawk. They were developed, hand in hand, as Gary Gygax's personal world and system after he and Arnesen and their friends reached the limits of what they could do with Chain Mail in the early 70s. That's where a lot of the metanarrative elements come from, like the aforementioned Elf-Trance and Sleep-Immunity. Something that Forgotten Realms included in it's elves because Greenwood based his setting on the D&D game system, since that was the system he was using, and the metanarrative elements carried over. It isn't a hodge-podge. It's a very specific fantasy that has been put into different settings and identities, but there's a reason Mordenkainen can be found in Curse of Strahd and Bigby's Grasping Hand is still a spell in Dragonlance. 2) I -wholehearedly- agree! If something doesn't fit your setting/narrative you wanna tell, cut it, unless you can find some new angle to insert it that fits what you want to do. There are no Catfolk in the Ashen Lands. But I have come to like the idea of Sorcerers as the "Magical 1%" narrative. Makes for an interesting sociological angle to play with. It's also why I wound up giving Bards Patrons. Not Warlock Patrons, but explicit narrative patrons as rich people paying their way in the world. 3) Restriction can breed creativity. Or frustration. Collaboration is almost always preferred, in my book. Even if that means someone doesn't get to play -exactly- what they want. For example I won't let anyone play a Werewolf at my table 'cause it's a major hassle for me to balance encounters and the like. But they can play a Shifter Barbarian and RP their character "Wolfing Out" when they rage. Y'know, so long as werewolves are a thing in the setting that it's appropriate for a character to play. S'okay! I'll go ahead and stop, at this point, as well. But I spent much of yesterday avoiding ENWorld because I knew the insult I had caused, however unintentionally, and wanted to do my best to avoid it, again, when I replied. I really am sorry. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Character Classes should Mean Something in the Setting
Top