Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="GnomeWorks" data-source="post: 4202165" data-attributes="member: 162">You have hit the nail on the head.What is this "standard" crap? 3.5 showed that you can, surprisingly enough, support a diverse set of characters with a single class. Why do the classes need to cling so tightly to archetypes? They don't need to, and it wouldn't take that much work to provide more versatility.Am I saying that 3.5 multiclassing was perfect? No, because you're right. If you didn't know what you were doing, you could severely screw yourself over that way.However, what if I like playing a somewhat mechanically-subpar character? We don't all have to be awesome, you know. Sometimes you want to be batman in a world of supermans.</blockquote>